XLII. fejezet · 22 tétel
A Költségvetés Közvetlen Bevételei és Kiadásai
Direct Revenues and Expenditures of the Budget
A fejezet audita
4.8% megtakarítás- Teljes előirányzat
- 6 569mrd Ft
- Első évi megtakarítás
- 315mrd Ft
- Tételek száma
- 22
- A teljes költségvetésből
- 15.00%
Költségvetési elemzés
Tételről tételre
Koppints bármelyik sorra az értékelésért, indoklásért és forrásokért.
Indoklás
The Egészségbiztosítási Alap (Health Insurance Fund) is, like the Pension Fund, structurally underfunded by its own contribution base, and the central budget transfers the shortfall. Whether Hungarian healthcare should move toward the Singapore CPF-Medisave or Swiss LAMal mechanism — funded individual health accounts, mandated competing insurers, a defined benefits package — is a substantive question for the Health Insurance Fund chapter. At this chapter's level the transfer is a Keep: it funds a function being analysed elsewhere.
Átállási mechanizmus
None. The transfer is retained as a pass-through; substantive classification and any transition mechanism belong to the Health Insurance Fund chapter.
Érintett csoportok
All residents who rely on the public health insurance system for healthcare access; healthcare providers (hospitals, clinics, GP practices) funded through the Health Insurance Fund; working-age contributors whose contributions and taxes fund the structural top-up.
Indoklás
This Fund mixes several categories that the framework treats very differently. Családi pótlék (family allowance, 304,994.3 millió Ft) is a near-universal child transfer; it is a discretionary demographic-allocation instrument rather than a rights-protection function, but its scale and the number of households relying on it make abrupt removal a reliance problem — substantive Phase-Out classification belongs to the family-policy chapter. Szolgálati járandóság (service annuity) and Korhatár előtti ellátás (early-retirement benefit) together at 122,093.6 millió Ft are legacy early-retirement entitlements of discrete cohorts admitted under closed schemes; these are reliance-protected and run off by cohort mortality — again a substantive matter for the social-protection chapter. Járási szociális feladatok (district social tasks, 180,803.7) and Jövedelempótló ellátások (income-replacement benefits, 80,710.6) include genuine last-resort support for people in involuntary hardship, the part of the social budget closest to a Keep. The honest classification at this chapter's level is to flag the Fund as mixed and defer; what this chapter records is the transfer, not the policy.
Átállási mechanizmus
None at this chapter's level. The transfer is retained as a pass-through; substantive classification and any transition mechanism for each sub-line belong to the family-policy and social-protection chapters.
Érintett csoportok
Families with children receiving Családi pótlék and other child benefits; early retirees with legacy entitlements (Szolgálati járandóság, Korhatár előtti ellátás); low-income individuals and households receiving income-replacement and district social support; people in involuntary hardship relying on last-resort benefits; working-age taxpayers who fund the entire Fund through SZJA and SzocHo.
Indoklás
Hungary's contribution to the EU budget is a treaty obligation flowing from membership. Within a realistic political horizon it binds; classification follows the constraint. The classical-liberal framework treats EU membership itself as changeable — withdrawal provisions exist — but that is a sovereign political question outside the scope of a budget-line analysis. While membership holds, the contribution is a Keep.
Átállási mechanizmus
None. The line is retained as a treaty obligation while EU membership holds. Any change would require a sovereign political decision on EU membership itself, which is outside the scope of this budget-line analysis.
Érintett csoportok
The EU budget and the EU programmes it funds (which Hungary contributes to and draws from); Hungarian beneficiaries of EU programmes (who depend on Hungary's continued membership and contribution); Hungarian taxpayers who fund the contribution.
Indoklás
A prudent general contingency reserve is a defensible feature of a budget — unforeseen events occur, and a reserve avoids mid-year emergency borrowing. The Céltartalékok (earmarked/target reserves, 749,275.0 millió Ft) and the small Védelmi tartalék and Árfolyam-kiegyenlítési Alap sit at Keep on that basis, with the standard caveat that "earmarked reserve" should mean earmarked: a 749 milliárd Ft target-reserve line invites the same itemisation recommendation as the Egyéb vegyes kiadások catch-all.
Átállási mechanizmus
None. The line is retained. Recommendation: future budgets should itemise the Céltartalékok at the level of individual earmarked purposes so that parliament and the taxpayer can see what a 749 milliárd Ft target-reserve pool is held against.
Érintett csoportok
The state and the public generally, who benefit from a contingency reserve that avoids disruptive mid-year borrowing; parliament, whose ability to scrutinise the reserve's composition is limited by its current aggregate presentation.
Indoklás
The Nyugdíjbiztosítási Alap (Pension Fund) runs a structural deficit — contributions do not cover obligations — and the central budget tops it up. The general top-up to the Pension Fund honours accrued pension entitlements of people who paid into a pay-as-you-go system in good faith; that reliance is precisely the property-rights interest the classical-liberal rule-of-law principle protects, and the transfer that funds it is a Keep at the level of this chapter. The substantive question — whether Hungary's PAYG pension architecture should transition toward funded individual accounts, on what horizon, with what bridge mechanism — belongs to the Pension Fund chapter, not here. Two sub-lines do warrant a flag at this chapter's level, because they are discretionary policy decisions, not actuarial obligations. The Tizenharmadik havi nyugdíj (13th-month pension), at 531,690.0 millió Ft, is a thirteenth monthly payment fully restored from 2022. It is a universalist transfer whose per-recipient value scales directly with the recipient's ordinary pension: a minimum-pension recipient on roughly 85,000 Ft a month receives a 13th payment of roughly 85,000 Ft; a recipient whose career earnings put their pension near 600,000 Ft a month receives a 13th payment of roughly 600,000 Ft — the same line, the same funding, a roughly sevenfold difference per recipient. The funding comes from general taxation paid disproportionately by working-age earners, including those whose own parents are on the minimum pension. The family-level reality is that a wage-earner whose grandparent receives the minimum-pension-scaled supplement is, through SZJA and SzocHo, also funding the much larger supplement of an unrelated upper-decile pensioner — and has less left to support their own family directly. The Nyugdíjprémium (pension premium), at 24,300.0 millió Ft, is a discretionary growth-contingent bonus, paid when GDP growth clears a threshold; it is policy, not entitlement. Neither is an accrued right; both are flagged for substantive treatment as discretionary transfers in the pension chapter.
Átállási mechanizmus
None. The general top-up is retained as a pass-through honouring accrued obligations; substantive classification and any transition mechanism belong to the Pension Fund chapter. The 13th-month pension and pension premium sub-lines are flagged for substantive review in the pension chapter.
Érintett csoportok
Current pensioners who receive their monthly pension from the PAYG system (protected by accrued-entitlement principle); working-age contributors whose payroll taxes fund the structural deficit; upper-decile pensioners who receive proportionally larger 13th-month payments; minimum-pension recipients whose 13th payment is modest relative to better-off pensioners.
Indoklás
This line aggregates housing-support instruments, the bulk of it (423,399.6 millió Ft) on the capital side. Hungarian housing subsidy has historically combined direct grants with subsidised mortgage credit; the capital-side weight here is consistent with construction-linked support. Demand-side housing subsidy is the textbook case of a transfer that capitalises into price: where supply is inelastic, a grant or a rate subsidy to buyers raises what sellers can charge, and a substantial share of the subsidy is captured by the existing owner rather than the intended recipient. The substantive classification — horizon, the distinction between demand-side subsidy and any genuine supply-side measure, the reliance interest of households with commitments already made — belongs to the housing chapter. Flagged here as a Phase-Out candidate with a five-year horizon to reflect multi-year construction and disbursement commitments; the receiving chapter sets the mechanism.
Átállási mechanizmus
Five-year phase-out horizon to reflect multi-year construction and disbursement commitments; the substantive mechanism — distinction between demand-side subsidy and supply-side measures, reliance protections for households with existing commitments — is set in the housing chapter.
Érintett csoportok
Households with existing housing-support commitments (protected by reliance provisions); prospective applicants for housing subsidies (lose access as the line runs off); existing homeowners (who captured subsidy capitalised into prices); construction and housing sector (affected by reduced demand-side stimulus).
Indoklás
The Babaváró programme provides a state-subsidised, interest-free general-purpose loan of up to 11 millió Ft to married couples where the wife is under 35; the debt is partly or fully forgiven on the birth of children. The budget line funds the interest subsidy and the forgiven principal. This is a demographic-allocation instrument: the state is using credit subsidy to influence household formation timing. Two mechanisms are at work. First, a subsidised interest rate is an administered price — it severs the loan's cost from the actual cost of capital, and where credit is mispriced, capital misallocates. Second, the evidence that pronatal cash and credit transfers shift the timing of births more than the completed family size suggests the programme buys a pull-forward rather than a trend break. The reform path: close the programme to new applicants, honour every loan already contracted in good faith — borrowers signed on specific terms and those terms are a property-rights commitment — and let the line run off as existing loans mature and their forgiveness conditions resolve. A three-year horizon reflects the run-off of the active forgiveness pipeline. The protected party is the cohort of current borrowers; the honouring mechanism is contract run-off; the bridge is funded from general revenue over the run-off years.
Átállási mechanizmus
Close the programme to new applicants, honour every loan already contracted in good faith — borrowers signed on specific terms and those terms are a property-rights commitment — and let the line run off as existing loans mature and their forgiveness conditions resolve. A three-year horizon reflects the run-off of the active forgiveness pipeline. The bridge is funded from general revenue over the run-off years.
Érintett csoportok
Married couples who are current Babaváró borrowers (protected by contract run-off); prospective applicants (no longer eligible for new loans); general taxpayers who funded the interest subsidy and principal forgiveness.
Források
- Babaváró hitel 2026: feltételek, igénylés, visszafizetés · Portfolio.hu (2026)
Indoklás
The Közfeladatok rezsikompenzációja (utility-cost compensation for public institutions, 228,229.9 millió Ft) compensates schools, hospitals and similar bodies for energy costs; it is a within-state transfer that belongs analytically with the institutions it funds, and is held at Nominal Freeze pending the energy-cost normalisation those chapters address.
Átállási mechanizmus
Nominal Freeze pending the energy-cost normalisation addressed in the chapters covering the institutions this line funds (schools, hospitals and similar public bodies). No indexation to inflation.
Érintett csoportok
Schools, hospitals, and similar public-task institutions that receive energy-cost compensation; their staff and service users, whose institutional operations depend on the line being maintained.
Indoklás
The Rendkívüli kormányzati intézkedések (extraordinary government measures, 191,999.0 millió Ft) is a reserve spent at executive discretion outside the normal appropriation process. From a public-choice standpoint a large discretionary-intervention pool weakens the budget's function as a parliamentary check on the executive — it is appropriation without the appropriation. It cannot be zeroed (genuine emergencies need a response), but it should not grow; Nominal Freeze, with the recommendation that its use be reported to parliament item by item.
Átállási mechanizmus
Nominal Freeze — hold at 191,999.0 millió Ft in nominal terms. No indexation to inflation. Recommendation that its use be reported to parliament item by item.
Érintett csoportok
Recipients of executive-discretion interventions funded from this reserve (undetermined by construction); parliament (whose appropriation function is weakened by a large undirected reserve); taxpayers, who cannot scrutinise how the reserve is spent.
Indoklás
The large Egyéb vegyes kiadások catch-all (161,033.4 millió Ft) is opaque by construction: a 161 milliárd Ft line labelled "other miscellaneous expenditures" is, from a public-choice standpoint, exactly the kind of low-visibility discretionary pool whose lack of itemisation is itself the finding. It cannot be cut on the strength of a label, but it should not be expanded; Nominal Freeze, with a recommendation that future budgets itemise it.
Átállási mechanizmus
Nominal Freeze — hold at 161,033.4 millió Ft in nominal terms. No indexation to inflation. Recommendation that future budgets itemise the line so that parliament and the taxpayer can see what this 161 milliárd Ft funds.
Érintett csoportok
Recipients of unitemised miscellaneous budget expenditures (undefined by construction of the catch-all); parliament and taxpayers, who lack visibility into the composition of the line.
Indoklás
This line compensates public-transport operators for fares foregone on statutory concessionary travel (pensioners, students, and similar categories). It is a transfer to transport operators routed through this chapter; whether the underlying concessionary-fare scheme should continue, and in what form, is a substantive question for the transport chapter. At this chapter's level it is a pass-through.
Átállási mechanizmus
None. The transfer is retained as a pass-through; substantive classification and any transition mechanism belong to the transport chapter.
Érintett csoportok
Pensioners, students, and other statutory concessionary-travel categories (who benefit from zero or reduced fares); public-transport operators (compensated for foregone fare revenue); general taxpayers who fund the compensation.
Indoklás
The line subsidises the interest rate on export credit channelled through Eximbank. It is an export subsidy delivered as an administered interest rate — the same mispriced-credit mechanism as the household loan schemes, applied to exporters. Phase-Out (3 years) flagged, with substantive treatment in the state-financial-institutions chapter; contracted credit lines run off, no new subsidised commitments.
Átállási mechanizmus
Phase-Out (3 years); contracted credit lines run off, no new subsidised commitments. Substantive treatment in the state-financial-institutions chapter.
Érintett csoportok
Exporters who rely on subsidised Eximbank credit (who lose access to below-market credit for new transactions); existing contracted borrowers (protected by credit-line run-off); general taxpayers who fund the interest-rate subsidy.
Indoklás
The Bethlen Gábor Alap funds support to ethnic-Hungarian communities beyond the borders — cultural, educational and community grants. The grant-allocation function is a discretionary subjective allocation by political officeholders: officials decide which organisations, in which communities, receive which sums, and there is no market price or contributor signal to discipline the mix — no operational test for whether 79 milliárd Ft reaches higher-valued uses than 40 milliárd or 120 milliárd Ft would. Phase the line out over three years, allowing in-flight multi-year grant commitments to run their course; the protected party is the grantee organisations with current commitments, the honouring mechanism is grant run-off.
Átállási mechanizmus
Phase the line out over three years, allowing in-flight multi-year grant commitments to run their course; the protected party is the grantee organisations with current commitments, the honouring mechanism is grant run-off.
Érintett csoportok
Ethnic-Hungarian community organisations beyond Hungary's borders (who receive cultural, educational and community grants); grantee organisations with current multi-year commitments (protected by grant run-off); Hungarian taxpayers who fund the discretionary allocation.
Indoklás
This line funds the supplementary financing of the indirect (tax-rebate) film-support system. It is a sector subsidy: a transfer to film production financed by general taxation. There is no rights-protection function here, no constitutional precondition, and no reliance interest of the kind that protects an accrued entitlement — a film-support rebate is a discretionary industrial subsidy. The seen is a domestically-shot production and the jobs on its set; the unseen is the 63 milliárd Ft of tax that funded it, drawn from wage-earners across every sector, and the productions and firms in other industries that did not receive a comparable subsidy and competed on unsubsidised terms. The argument that the rebate "pays for itself" through induced activity is the candle-makers' argument: every subsidised industry can point to the visible activity its subsidy supports while the diffuse cost to everyone else stays invisible. The line can be eliminated in a single budget cycle; productions with rebate claims already accrued under existing law are honoured as a contractual matter, but no new commitments are made.
Átállási mechanizmus
The line can be eliminated in a single budget cycle; productions with rebate claims already accrued under existing law are honoured as a contractual matter, but no new commitments are made.
Érintett csoportok
Film production companies and their staff (who lose access to future rebates); wage-earners across all sectors (who funded the subsidy); firms in other industries that competed on unsubsidised terms.
Indoklás
These lines provision for guarantees the state has already issued — if a guaranteed borrower defaults, the state pays. The provision is a real liability honouring a real contract; it cannot be cut without abrogating commitments the state made to lenders who relied on them. What the framework does object to is the issuance of new state guarantees: a state credit guarantee is an off-balance-sheet subsidy that distorts lending by socialising downside risk. That objection belongs to the credit-guarantee scheme chapters, where the flow of new guarantees is decided. The provisioning line here is the contractual tail of guarantees already written — Keep.
Átállási mechanizmus
None. The line is retained as a contractual obligation for guarantees already issued. The reform focus is on the flow of new guarantees (analysed in the credit-guarantee scheme chapters), not on the provisioning for existing ones.
Érintett csoportok
Lenders who hold state-guaranteed loans (who rely on the guarantee provision being honoured on default); guaranteed borrowers (companies and households whose credit carries a state guarantee); taxpayers who bear the contingent liability when defaults occur.
Indoklás
The Központi Nukleáris Pénzügyi Alap (Central Nuclear Financial Fund) is categorically different from the Bethlen Gábor Alap: it provisions for the decommissioning of nuclear facilities and the long-term management of radioactive waste. That is a protective response to irreversible involuntary harm — the magnitude and irreversibility of nuclear contamination make safe decommissioning a matter of rights, not preference — and the fund is the mechanism that ensures the money is set aside before the liability falls due. Keep.
Átállási mechanizmus
None. The line is retained. The fund must continue to accumulate provisions ahead of the decommissioning liability; interrupting contributions would mean the liability falls due without the dedicated reserve to meet it.
Érintett csoportok
Current and future populations living near nuclear facilities (who are protected by the decommissioning fund against irreversible contamination); nuclear facility operators (who are obliged to decommission safely); the state, which bears the contingent liability if the fund is insufficient when the liability falls due.
Indoklás
Munkáshitel is a more recent subsidised-loan scheme for young workers. The same mechanism objection as Babaváró applies: a subsidised interest rate is an administered price that detaches the cost of credit from the cost of capital. The same reform path applies: close to new entrants, honour contracted loans, run off the line over the maturity of the existing book. Three-year horizon, contract run-off, general revenue funds the bridge.
Átállási mechanizmus
Close to new entrants, honour contracted loans, run off the line over the maturity of the existing book. Three-year horizon, contract run-off, general revenue funds the bridge.
Érintett csoportok
Young workers who are current Munkáshitel borrowers (protected by contract run-off); prospective young-worker applicants (no longer eligible for new loans); general taxpayers who funded the interest subsidy.
Indoklás
The claims-settlement and compensation lines (Kárrendezési célelőirányzat, Magán- és egyéb jogi személyek kártérítése) honour the state's liability when its acts cause harm — a rule-of-law function, Keep. The 1% SZJA közcélú felhasználása (18,239.8 millió Ft) is the channel through which taxpayers designate 1% of their already-paid income tax to a civil-society organisation; it is not new spending but a citizen-directed allocation of tax already collected, and is the most market-like allocation mechanism in the whole chapter — the taxpayer, not an official, picks the recipient.
Átállási mechanizmus
None. The line is retained. The compensation and claims-settlement components honour existing legal liabilities. The 1% SZJA channel is retained as the most market-like allocation mechanism in the chapter.
Érintett csoportok
Individuals and legal entities whose claims against the state are settled through the compensation lines; civil-society organisations that receive citizen-directed 1% SZJA designations; taxpayers who exercise their designation right.
Indoklás
The line funds the interest subsidy and risk component of the state student-loan system. Student finance has a defensible rationale that the pure consumption-loan subsidies above lack: human-capital investment has a long and uncertain payoff, and a private lender cannot take an equity claim on a future graduate's earnings, so the credit market for it is genuinely thin. That is an argument for a loan facility, not necessarily for an interest subsidy; a state student-loan scheme can be designed to be self-financing at a market-reflecting rate. Hold the line nominally while the subsidy element is reviewed against an income-contingent, cost-reflecting redesign; real erosion at 2.5% inflation reduces the line's real weight by roughly a fifth over a decade.
Átállási mechanizmus
Hold the line nominally while the subsidy element is reviewed against an income-contingent, cost-reflecting redesign; real erosion at 2.5% inflation reduces the line's real weight by roughly a fifth over a decade.
Érintett csoportok
Current and prospective university students relying on state student loans (who benefit from the subsidy element under review); graduates repaying income-contingent loans; higher-education institutions indirectly affected by student-financing conditions.
Indoklás
Capital subscriptions and membership dues to the World Bank group (IBRD, IDA), the Council of Europe Development Bank (CEB), and the EBRD are treaty-based commitments arising from membership; they bind while the memberships hold. The Bruegel tagdíj (Bruegel membership fee, 44.4 millió Ft) is a discretionary subscription to a Brussels economic think tank — small enough that the administrative cost of contesting it would exceed the saving, but not a treaty obligation; it sits at Keep only on de-minimis grounds.
Átállási mechanizmus
None. The line is retained as treaty-based membership obligations. The Bruegel subscription is retained on de-minimis grounds; any review would need to weigh the administrative cost of renegotiation against the saving.
Érintett csoportok
The international financial institutions (IBRD, IDA, CEB, EBRD) that receive capital subscriptions; development-finance beneficiaries who receive loans co-financed by these institutions; Hungary, which benefits from membership access to development finance and policy networks.
Indoklás
Peres ügyek (Litigation, 2,000.0) and Tőkekiegyenlítés (Capital equalisation, 364.0) and Követeléskezelés költségei (Receivables-management costs, 1.5): routine, Keep. Gyermek és ifjúsági balesetbiztosítás (Child and youth accident insurance, 100.0): a small statutory insurance line, Keep on de-minimis grounds.
Átállási mechanizmus
None. These lines are retained as routine legal and administrative obligations. The child and youth accident insurance is retained on de-minimis grounds.
Érintett csoportok
Parties to state litigation proceedings; entities involved in capital equalisation and receivables-management processes; children and young people covered by the statutory accident insurance.
Indoklás
Compensation for historic expropriations and injustices — a closed-class, reliance-protected legacy obligation that runs off by cohort mortality. Honouring it is a rule-of-law commitment.
Átállási mechanizmus
None. The line is retained and runs off naturally by cohort mortality as the population of eligible claimants diminishes over time.
Érintett csoportok
Surviving claimants entitled to compensation for historic expropriations and injustices under closed-class legacy compensation schemes.
Szabad Társadalom Intézet
Támogasd a független elemzéseket
Kutatásunk ingyenes, nyílt és nem szponzorált. Ha hasznosnak találod, segíts fenntartani.