Immediate Cut

From the 2026 budget audit

One village's sports hall renovation: 79 million Ft, in the national budget, by name.

A named capital grant to one small municipality for renovating its sports hall — the same single-municipality earmark pattern that names one beneficiary and spreads the cost across the entire national taxpayer base.

About 20 Ft per taxpayer — 79 million Ft total — for one municipality's sports-hall renovation, charged nationally rather than to the residents who would use the facility.

0 bn HUF allocation 18 HUF / taxpayer / year 0 bn HUF Year-1 saving

What you see — and what you don't

The seen: Szenna municipality's sports hall renovated at national expense. The unseen: the residents of every other municipality in Hungary — many with their own unmet facility needs — who collectively fund a repair that Szenna's own budget and the equal-terms formula grant exist to cover.

Objection

"Small municipalities genuinely can't afford facility renovations from their own budgets — national support is how they maintain basic infrastructure."

Answer

Routine municipal facility maintenance is exactly what the general operating grant and a municipality's own budget exist to fund — for every municipality, on equal terms. Carving a specific repair into the national budget as a named line is not maintenance support; it is a discretionary allocation to one named beneficiary. The mechanism, not the amount, is the problem.

Share if you think all municipalities deserve equal-terms funding, not named earmarks for the well-connected.

The analyst's verdict

Support for the renovation of the sports hall of Szenna municipality

Rationale

A named capital grant to a single small municipality for renovating its sports hall. The principle is identical to Cím 3.5 and scales regardless of the small amount: a budget line that names one municipality and one facility is discretionary allocation of national tax revenue to a concentrated local beneficiary, outside any formula or competitive criterion. A municipality's sports facility, if its residents value it, is funded from the municipality's own budget or the equal-terms formula grant. Classified Immediate Cut, with the standard honour-signed-contracts qualification.

Transition mechanism

Eliminate the earmark; honour any signed contract through run-off; cut the unobligated balance.

Affected groups

Szenna municipality and its sports-hall project; the national taxpayer base.

Free Society Institute

Support independent analysis

Our research is free, open, and unsponsored. If you find it valuable, help us keep it that way.