A 2026-os költségvetés-elemzésből
501.9 millió Ft to run grants with no named recipients and no defined output.
Operating costs for a residual grant programme — no specified deliverable, no protected counterparty, no output the cost is priced against.
Roughly 126 Ft per taxpayer per year — 501.9 millió Ft in administration for a programme that cannot say what it administers.
Amit látsz — és amit nem
The seen: the activity of running a grant allocation process. The unseen: the taxpayer whose contribution funds an administrative apparatus with no stated product and no named beneficiary who could be examined.
Ellenvetés
"Some programmes are genuinely experimental — you can't name outcomes before you know what works."
Válasz
Experimental programmes have hypotheses, defined criteria, and exit conditions. A line named 'further energy and emission-reduction programmes' with no stated counterparty is not experimental — it is open-ended. Cut the operating costs; if a specific programme worth running can be named and scoped, it can be re-presented as such.
Share if you think public grant programmes should name what they fund before spending the money.
Az elemző értékelése
Energia- és klímapolitikai modernizációs rendszer — További energetikai és kibocsátáscsökkentési programok — működési
Az elemző indoklása jelenleg angol nyelven elérhető; magyar fordítás folyamatban.
Indoklás
Another discretionary grant line with no named deliverable and no protected counterparty. Immediate Cut.
Átállási mechanizmus
Eliminate in the 2026 cycle.
Érintett csoportok
Recipients of discretionary energy and emission-reduction grants; no protected counterparty is identified.
Szabad Társadalom Intézet
Támogasd a független elemzéseket
Kutatásunk ingyenes, nyílt és nem szponzorált. Ha hasznosnak találod, segíts fenntartani.