A smaller version of the same allocation mechanism

220 millió Ft channelled through the regional development councils — the same discretionary capital-allocation mechanism as the main Fund, at smaller scale.

Roughly 55 Ft per taxpayer per year — 220 millió Ft total, on the same four-year phase-out glide as the main Regional Development Fund.

0 bn HUF allocation 49 HUF / taxpayer / year 0 bn HUF Year-1 saving

What you see — and what you don't

The seen: a 220 millió Ft capital resource distributed through the councils to politically-selected projects. The unseen: the private investment that does not happen because that saving was redirected by a council facing an application queue rather than a market test.

Objection

"But regional development needs both a large fund and a complementary smaller resource for projects that fall below the main fund's threshold."

Answer

Whether 220 millió Ft or 65,000 millió Ft, the mechanism is the same: capital allocated by political selection rather than by a profit-and-loss test. Scale does not change the argument; it changes only the magnitude of the misallocation and the rent it creates for aligned applicants.

Share if you think a forint of public capital is subject to the same accountability test regardless of the fund it flows through.

The analyst's verdict

Development Resource of the Development Councils

Rationale

A second, smaller discretionary development resource channelled through the same regional development councils. It is the same mechanism as the Területfejlesztési Alap at smaller scale — politically-selected allocation of capital — and is classified identically, on the same four-year glide.

Transition mechanism

Linear phase-out over 4 years, parallel to the Területfejlesztési Alap and the councils' operating line.

Affected groups

As for the development councils above.

Free Society Institute

Support independent analysis

Our research is free, open, and unsponsored. If you find it valuable, help us keep it that way.