From the 2026 budget audit
500 million Ft for diaspora religious life — paid by Hungarians who stayed
The state budget allocates 500 million Ft to support the religious activities of Hungarians living abroad — a transfer from domestic taxpayers to communities in other countries with their own legal and financial infrastructure.
About 125 Ft per taxpayer per year for religious activities of Hungarians living and worshipping in other countries.
What you see — and what you don't
The seen: Hungarian religious communities in Western Europe, North America, and elsewhere receiving state support for their worship and community activities. The unseen: the wage-earner in Hungary — perhaps with their own modest parish relying entirely on voluntary contributions — whose tax supplements the religious life of Hungarian diaspora communities in countries where civil society is more affluent and the SZJA 1% mechanism is not available to them anyway.
Objection
"Diaspora communities preserve Hungarian language and culture — religious life is part of that preservation."
Answer
Hungarian diaspora identity is sustained by the communities themselves. A state budget line in Budapest is not how diaspora communities maintain their cultural identity; it is one of many funding sources, and not the primary one. The immediate cut removes a transfer that carries no accrued entitlement; diaspora religious communities, like all voluntary associations, are funded by their members — and diaspora communities are, by definition, living in countries with functioning civil-society infrastructure to support them.
Share if you think diaspora cultural life should be supported by diaspora communities themselves.
The analyst's verdict
Support for Religious Life of Hungarians Abroad and in the Diaspora
Rationale
Religious practice is the paradigm case of a voluntary association. A church is sustained by the freely-given contributions of its believers — and Hungarian churches, like churches everywhere, have a millennia-tested mechanism for this: the offering, the tithe, the membership of the faithful. The classical-liberal frame does not judge the worth of religious life; it observes that religious life does not require involuntary tax financing, because the people who value a church can and historically do fund it directly. The six small lines carry no comparable multi-year reliance and are Immediate Cuts.
Transition mechanism
The six small lines carry no comparable multi-year reliance and are Immediate Cuts. Across the cluster, the SZJA 1% church designation — the genuinely voluntary channel — is untouched and becomes the primary funding route.
Affected groups
Churches and religious institutions, who transition from state grant to offering-and-membership funding plus the intact 1% designation. No believer loses the right to practise or to fund their church; the reform removes the involuntary contribution of non-members, not the voluntary contribution of members.
Free Society Institute
Support independent analysis
Our research is free, open, and unsponsored. If you find it valuable, help us keep it that way.