2.5 billion Ft a year to one named private association — by statutory right.

Rationale

This is a named line-item grant to a single private civic association, the Rákóczi Szövetség. The association runs identity and school-enrolment programmes for Hungarian minority youth and a diaspora programme bringing young Hungarians from outside the Carpathian Basin on study visits. Whatever the association's merits, a statutory budget line transferring 2,500.0 millió Ft a year to one named private membership organisation is concentrated rent in its clearest form. The association is a voluntary body with members, donors, and a cause; the framework's question is not whether its activity is worthwhile but whether compelling every Hungarian taxpayer to fund one particular association's programme — to the exclusion of every other association with a similar cause that does not have a named budget line — can be justified as anything other than political selection of a favoured recipient. It cannot. A membership association with an identity-promotion mission is exactly the kind of body that voluntary financing reaches at the scale of genuine support: members pay dues, donors who value the cause give, and the cross-border Hungarian business community sponsors the programmes it considers worthwhile. The seen is the association's funded programme; the unseen is every comparable civic initiative that receives nothing because it lacks the line, and the taxpayers across the income distribution who fund a body they did not choose. There is no dependency chain that ties citizens' life plans to this transfer and no good-faith contractual right that abolition would violate — the association can solicit voluntary support from the same Hungarian public the moment the line ends. Immediate Cut, with the full 2,500.0 millió Ft restored to general revenue in the first cycle.