A 2026-os költségvetés-elemzésből
A 216 milliárd Ft directorate exists because the state buys too much
KEF is the administrative layer created to aggregate the state's own purchasing — evidence of the scale of the underlying problem, not a solution to it.
Roughly 54,000 Ft per taxpayer per year — 215,860 millió Ft total, over 90% of which is goods and facility-management services bought on behalf of other ministries.
Amit látsz — és amit nem
The seen: framework contracts that let smaller bodies draw down central purchasing agreements. The unseen: the direct price signal that each ministry would face if it procured its own facilities from the competitive market — and the competitive discipline that replaces it once the aggregating layer is gone.
Ellenvetés
"But central purchasing saves money through bulk buying — small bodies get better prices through KEF."
Válasz
Centralising purchasing mutes the price signal each body faces directly. When a ministry's facilities budget is someone else's problem, it has no incentive to economise on space or service quality. The facility-management market in Hungary is genuinely competitive; devolving the budget to using bodies restores that discipline. The bulk-pricing argument is the second-best fix for a first-best failure.
Share if you think each ministry should face the cost of its own facilities directly.
Az elemző értékelése
Közbeszerzési és Ellátási Főigazgatóság
Az elemző indoklása jelenleg angol nyelven elérhető; magyar fordítás folyamatban.
Indoklás
The arithmetic here demands attention. Of the 215.9 milliárd Ft envelope, personnel and employer contributions are only 17.2 milliárd Ft; the operating line (dologi kiadások) is 194.4 milliárd Ft — over 90% of the total. KEF performs two functions: it runs the centralised public-procurement system as the state's central purchasing body, concluding framework agreements that other government bodies draw down against; and it provides building operation, maintenance, vehicle fleet, and logistics services for ministries — managing a large portfolio of centrally held government buildings. The 194.4 milliárd Ft operating line is overwhelmingly the cost of buying those facility-management services and goods on behalf of other bodies. KEF is the kind of body the framework treats with particular care: a central purchasing authority is not a solution to a problem; it is evidence of the scale of the underlying problem. The state buys so much, across so many bodies, that it has created a directorate to aggregate the purchasing. The centralisation argument — small bodies get the framework-contract price — is real, but it is the second-best fix for a first-best failure. Each ministry running its own facilities, on its own budget, faces the price it pays directly; an aggregating intermediary mutes that signal. The cleaner arrangement is for each government body to procure its own facility-management services from the competitive market under ordinary procurement rules, with the property portfolio devolved to the using bodies or to a slim asset-management function. The facility-management market in Hungary is genuinely competitive; there is no network-economic element here that requires a single state buyer. This is the pattern where an administrative body is mistaken for the cure when it is part of the construction. The honest classification is phase-out parallel to the underlying activity: as ministries take their own facilities budgets and procure directly, KEF's aggregating role dissolves.
Átállási mechanizmus
Four-year phase-out. The 4-year horizon is set by the framework-agreement cycle: KEF's standing framework contracts with suppliers are typically multi-year, and existing draw-downs by client bodies must run their contractual course rather than being abrogated. Year 1: devolve the facilities and procurement budgets of the largest client ministries; KEF's operating envelope contracts as those bodies procure directly. Years 2-4: complete the devolution as remaining framework agreements expire and are not renewed centrally. The 15.1 milliárd Ft personnel line (plus 2.1 milliárd Ft employer contributions, 17.2 milliárd Ft combined) is the protected payroll component: KEF's roughly 1,200-1,400 staff have transferable facilities-management, procurement, and logistics skills, and severance-with-overlap — full state salary for 24 months, with the right to take private-sector employment and keep both incomes — fits the case. Many would transfer with the devolved functions to the client ministries or to the private facility-management firms that take over the contracts. The 194.4 milliárd Ft operating line is not severance-protected: it is the cost of goods and services bought on behalf of others, and it does not disappear so much as move — the client bodies still need facilities, but they procure them directly rather than through KEF. The genuine fiscal saving is the elimination of the aggregating layer's own overhead and the competitive-tendering discipline restored to each body, not the full 215.9 milliárd Ft.
Érintett csoportok
KEF's permanent staff (roughly 1,200-1,400 on the facilities, procurement, and logistics functions); supplier firms holding current framework agreements (protected by contract run-off); client ministries, which gain direct budget responsibility for their own facilities. The schedule reflects the net saving conservatively: the operating line is treated as continuing expenditure that relocates rather than vanishes, so the year-by-year net saving is the payroll and aggregation-overhead component, not the gross envelope.
Szabad Társadalom Intézet
Támogasd a független elemzéseket
Kutatásunk ingyenes, nyílt és nem szponzorált. Ha hasznosnak találod, segíts fenntartani.