A 2026-os költségvetés-elemzésből
15.5 billion Ft in capital investment for church-run public services
Church-administered public-service buildings and community facilities receive 15,460 million Ft in state capital investment — the largest church capital line, and the most complex to separate from genuine public-service contracting.
About 3,877 Ft per taxpayer per year for church-administered schools, care homes, and community facilities — capital investment whose public-service component deserves transparent procurement, not a lump church-transfer.
Amit látsz — és amit nem
The seen: church-run schools, care facilities, community halls, and public-service buildings receiving state capital investment. The unseen: the distinction between capital funding for the public service — a school place, a care bed, a community facility open to all — and capital funding for the ecclesiastical institution that happens to provide it. When both flows are in a single line, the public-service case is used to justify the institutional subsidy.
Ellenvetés
"Churches deliver public services — schools, care homes, hospitals. Their capital investment is the state's responsibility."
Válasz
Capital funding for public services delivered by churches is a procurement matter: the state buys school places or care beds at transparent rates, regardless of who provides them. That argument supports procurement contracts with church institutions, not a 15.5 billion Ft capital grant. The five-year phase-out gives in-flight construction projects time to complete; future capital investment for church-delivered public services migrates to transparent procurement rather than sectoral grants.
Share if you think church public-service funding should be transparent procurement, not a sectoral capital grant.
Az elemző értékelése
Egyházi közfeladatellátási és közösségi célú beruházások támogatása
Az elemző indoklása jelenleg angol nyelven elérhető; magyar fordítás folyamatban.
Indoklás
Religious practice is the paradigm case of a voluntary association. A church is sustained by the freely-given contributions of its believers — and Hungarian churches, like churches everywhere, have a millennia-tested mechanism for this: the offering, the tithe, the membership of the faithful. The classical-liberal frame does not judge the worth of religious life; it observes that religious life does not require involuntary tax financing, because the people who value a church can and historically do fund it directly. The seen here is a funded parish, a renovated church building, a supplemented clergy income. The unseen is the wage-earner — of any faith or none — whose SZJA was routed to a religious institution they may not belong to and did not choose.
Átállási mechanizmus
The capital and heritage lines (23,503.8, 15,460.2, 14,964.3, 4,386.6) typically sit inside multi-year renovation and construction commitments; a five-year linear run-off lets in-flight building contracts complete while no new ones are commissioned on the state account. Across the cluster, the SZJA 1% church designation — the genuinely voluntary channel — is untouched and becomes the primary funding route.
Érintett csoportok
Churches and religious institutions, who transition from state grant to offering-and-membership funding plus the intact 1% designation; construction counterparties on capital lines, protected by contract run-off. No believer loses the right to practise or to fund their church; the reform removes the involuntary contribution of non-members, not the voluntary contribution of members.
Szabad Társadalom Intézet
Támogasd a független elemzéseket
Kutatásunk ingyenes, nyílt és nem szponzorált. Ha hasznosnak találod, segíts fenntartani.