A 2026-os költségvetés-elemzésből
2.3 billion Ft to develop church institutions in other countries
Hungarian state money funds the development of church institutions in Romania, Slovakia, Serbia, and Ukraine — investments in foreign jurisdictions, paid for by domestic taxpayers.
About 579 Ft per taxpayer per year for the expansion of church institutions outside Hungary's borders.
Amit látsz — és amit nem
The seen: church schools, community centres, and institutions in Hungarian-majority regions of neighbouring countries, developed with Budapest support. The unseen: the Hungarian worker whose tax funds capital development in other countries' jurisdictions — countries which have their own state budgets, their own church-funding mechanisms, and their own legal frameworks for minority institutions.
Ellenvetés
"Hungarian minority communities across the border face discrimination — state support for their institutions is a form of minority protection."
Válasz
Minority protection is a serious claim. But the instrument matters: a bilateral agreement with a neighbouring state, a foundation with an endowment, or EU minority-rights mechanisms are more durable instruments for minority protection than an annual budget line that can be cut by any future government. The immediate cut is appropriate where no accrued entitlement exists and the funds are going to institutions in foreign legal jurisdictions.
Share if you think minority protection across the border deserves durable treaty mechanisms, not annual budget transfers.
Az elemző értékelése
Határon túli egyházi intézmények fejlesztésének támogatása
Az elemző indoklása jelenleg angol nyelven elérhető; magyar fordítás folyamatban.
Indoklás
Religious practice is the paradigm case of a voluntary association. A church is sustained by the freely-given contributions of its believers — and Hungarian churches, like churches everywhere, have a millennia-tested mechanism for this: the offering, the tithe, the membership of the faithful. The classical-liberal frame does not judge the worth of religious life; it observes that religious life does not require involuntary tax financing, because the people who value a church can and historically do fund it directly. The six small lines carry no comparable multi-year reliance and are Immediate Cuts.
Átállási mechanizmus
The six small lines carry no comparable multi-year reliance and are Immediate Cuts. Across the cluster, the SZJA 1% church designation — the genuinely voluntary channel — is untouched and becomes the primary funding route.
Érintett csoportok
Churches and religious institutions across the border, who transition from state grant to offering-and-membership funding plus the intact 1% designation. No believer loses the right to practise or to fund their church; the reform removes the involuntary contribution of non-members, not the voluntary contribution of members.
Szabad Társadalom Intézet
Támogasd a független elemzéseket
Kutatásunk ingyenes, nyílt és nem szponzorált. Ha hasznosnak találod, segíts fenntartani.