A 2026-os költségvetés-elemzésből
Your utility bill doesn't reflect what the infrastructure costs — because part of that cost is on your tax bill instead.
3.5 milliárd Ft of central-government utility and waste-management investment that should be financed by regulated tariffs and municipalities — not extracted from general taxation.
3,512.4 millió Ft per year from general revenues for utility and waste infrastructure whose capital cost should sit with the operators and municipalities that manage it, recovered through the tariffs users actually pay.
Amit látsz — és amit nem
The seen: utility and waste infrastructure funded from central budget, keeping tariffs artificially low for users. The unseen: a tariff that no longer carries accurate information — because the true capital cost has been shifted onto every taxpayer, including those served by entirely different utility networks. The user who benefits from the infrastructure is not paying for it; the worker in a different region is.
Ellenvetés
"But keeping utility costs down helps ordinary households — central investment keeps bills affordable."
Válasz
A tariff that does not reflect the true cost of the infrastructure does not help households understand what they are consuming or what it costs to provide. It also means the financing decision sits with central government rather than with the operator and municipality that hold the local knowledge of what infrastructure is needed and where. The reform moves capital financing to regulated tariffs — the cost stays with the user, the decision moves closer to the ground.
Share if you think utility users — not general taxpayers — should finance the infrastructure they benefit from.
Az elemző értékelése
Egyes közmű és hulladékgazdálkodási beruházások
Az elemző indoklása jelenleg angol nyelven elérhető; magyar fordítás folyamatban.
Indoklás
This line funds state investment in certain utility and waste-management infrastructure. The classification turns on a distinction the line's title blurs. Some utility and waste-management activity is genuinely network-economic — the physical pipe-and-grid networks that distribute water or collect waste have last-mile characteristics that resist fragmentary private provision. But utility and waste-management *services* — generation, treatment, collection operations, retail — are contestable, and across Europe they are routinely provided by regulated private and municipal operators rather than financed from a central state capital account. A central-government investment line for "certain" utility and waste projects, undifferentiated, is most likely topping up capital that should be carried either by the utility operators themselves (recovered through regulated user tariffs, as utility capital normally is) or by the municipalities within whose competence local utility and waste infrastructure sits. The mechanism worth naming: when central general revenue funds utility capital that a user tariff could carry, it breaks the link between the cost of the infrastructure and the price the user sees. The user pays a tariff that does not reflect the true capital cost, because part of that cost has been shifted onto the general taxpayer; the tariff stops carrying accurate information about what the service costs to provide. The honest financing model for utility capital is recovery through the regulated tariff paid by users, with the capital decision sitting with the operator and the municipality, not with a central investment account. This is a Phase-Out rather than an Immediate Cut because in-flight utility and waste projects have contractual counterparties and serve communities with a genuine reliance on the infrastructure being completed, and because responsibility needs an orderly transfer to the operators and municipalities that should carry it. The four-year horizon allows in-progress projects to complete and the financing responsibility to migrate to the regulated-tariff and municipal model.
Átállási mechanizmus
Phase-Out over four years, linear. Years 1–4 fund the completion of utility and waste projects already in progress on a declining schedule; over the same period, transfer the financing responsibility for utility and waste-management capital to the regulated utility operators (recovered through user tariffs) and to the municipalities within whose competence the infrastructure sits. The line closes at the end of Year 4; the function continues, carried by the operators and municipalities and financed by the users who benefit.
Érintett csoportok
Utility and waste-management operators and the municipalities that would assume financing responsibility; utility users, who would see tariffs that reflect true capital cost rather than a tariff partly cross-subsidised by general taxation; contractors on in-flight projects (honoured through completion); taxpayers.
Szabad Társadalom Intézet
Támogasd a független elemzéseket
Kutatásunk ingyenes, nyílt és nem szponzorált. Ha hasznosnak találod, segíts fenntartani.