From the 2026 Budget Audit
Half of the party-foundation budget goes to one foundation — the governing majority's.
3,230 million Ft funds eleven research and civic-education foundations attached to political parties. The largest single transfer — 1,594 million Ft, roughly half the envelope — goes to the foundation in the orbit of the current parliamentary majority.
3,230 million Ft total — roughly 799 Ft per household — funding think tanks whose operating model is retaining a budget line, not persuading supporters to contribute.
What you see — and what you don't
The seen: foundations producing policy research, publications, and civic education under the banner of their respective parties. The unseen: the test those foundations never have to pass — whether the people whose ideas they claim to advance value that work enough to fund it voluntarily. This institute operates on the model it recommends: funded by those who find the work worth supporting.
Objection
"Policy research serves the public interest regardless of which foundation produces it; cutting this funding leaves a vacuum."
Answer
Policy research, publication, and civic education are precisely what voluntary associations exist to carry. Whether a tradition's ideas deserve to be developed is answered by the willingness of adherents to fund the work. A state transfer substitutes incumbency for that test — and concentrates the subsidy, by formula, in the foundations of the parties already holding the most seats.
Share if you think think tanks should survive on the support of people who believe in their work.
The analyst's verdict
Support for Party Foundations
Rationale
The party-foundation transfers are state financing of the research, civic-education, and policy-advocacy bodies attached to political parties. The funding formula concentrates the subsidy in the foundations affiliated with the largest parties: the single largest recipient, at 1,593.9 millió Ft — roughly half the entire party-foundation envelope — is the Szövetség a Polgári Magyarországért Alapítvány, the foundation in the orbit of the governing majority. The activity these foundations carry out — political research, the publication of policy ideas, civic education in a particular ideological tradition — is the defining activity of a voluntarily-funded think tank or political foundation. Whether a tradition's ideas deserve to be developed and propagated is a question answered by the willingness of that tradition's adherents to fund the work; a state transfer substitutes a seat-weighted political appropriation for that test and converts the foundation's incentive from persuading supporters to retaining its line. This is a sharper case than the party transfers themselves: a parliamentary party has at least a defined constitutional role in the legislature, whereas a party foundation is a pure advocacy-and-research body, exactly the kind of organisation the classical-liberal frame expects to be voluntarily financed. The reliance interest is correspondingly weaker — these are not bodies contesting an imminent election — so an immediate cut is the honest classification rather than a phased transition. The institute making this argument operates on precisely the model it recommends: a policy-research body financed by those who value its work, not by a statutory line.
Transition mechanism
Delete the lines in the 2026 cycle. Foundations that command genuine support among their tradition's adherents continue on voluntary contributions; those that do not contract to the scale their voluntary support sustains.
Affected groups
The eleven party foundations and their staff. The development and propagation of political ideas is not impaired by the change of funding source; it is carried by whatever voluntary support each tradition commands.
Szabad Társadalom Intézet
Support Independent Analysis
Our research is free, open, and unsponsored. If you find it valuable, help us keep it that way.