Chapter XXI: Miniszterelnöki Kabinetiroda (Prime Minister’s Cabinet Office)

Overview

Chapter XXI covers the Miniszterelnöki Kabinetiroda (Prime Minister’s Cabinet Office, PMCO), the ministry led by Minister Antal Rogán and responsible for government communication, domestic intelligence coordination, civil society grants, national security services, and state events. It is one of the most politically sensitive chapters in the entire budget, combining legitimate national security functions with large-scale government propaganda and patronage spending.

Total expenditure (2026): 337,659.6 millió Ft
Total revenue (2026): 1,179.8 millió Ft
Net cost to taxpayers: 336,479.8 millió Ft

The chapter encompasses nine institutional units (cím) and two pools of discretionary appropriations (fejezeti/központi kezelésű előirányzatok). The institutional units range from legitimate security services (domestic counterintelligence, foreign intelligence, signals intelligence) to the National Communications Office — a government advertising and PR coordination agency — and a dedicated government propaganda fund. The chapter-managed appropriations are where the most fiscally significant and analytically problematic items appear.

---

Expenditure Analysis

1. Miniszterelnöki Kabinetiroda — Core Operations (Cím 1)

• Current allocation: 14,363.4 millió Ft
  (Personnel: 10,499.4 | Employer contributions: 1,524.0 | Goods and services: 1,759.3 | Capital investment: 580.7)
• Classification: Phase-Out (3 years)
• Rationale: The Cabinet Office in its current form serves primarily as the political hub for government communication strategy, patronage distribution, and coordination of the intelligence apparatus — functions that either belong in separate, leaner ministries or should not exist in a night-watchman state. The staffing level (implied by a 10.5-billion-forint personnel budget) is grossly disproportionate to the residual coordination functions that a minimal government would require. From an Austrian perspective, this bureaucratic center creates no economic value and instead dissipates it through the calculation problem: central political coordination substitutes arbitrary political judgment for decentralized, price-guided resource allocation. The 580.7-million capital investment further entrenches the institution.
• Transition mechanism: Year 1: Freeze headcount; transfer security service oversight to a reconstituted Interior Ministry; Year 2: Cut personnel by 50%, eliminate capital budget; Year 3: Dissolve residual coordination functions; any remaining legitimate national security oversight folded into Ministry of Interior or Defence. Full elimination of the political communication and patronage coordination role by end of Year 3.
• Affected groups: Approximately 500–700 civil servants (estimated from personnel budget) who would be subject to retrenchment or redeployment. Transition costs include redundancy payments.

---

2. Nemzeti Kommunikációs Hivatal — National Communications Office (Cím 2)

• Current allocation: 1,633.5 millió Ft (expenditure)
  (Personnel: 893.9 | Employer contributions: 127.6 | Goods and services: 588.4 | Capital investment: 23.6)
• Own revenue: 600.0 millió Ft (operating)
• Classification: Immediate Cut
• Rationale: The Nemzeti Kommunikációs Hivatal (NKH) was created in 2014 to centralize and coordinate all government advertising and PR procurement. It is, by its own statutory definition, an organ that coordinates government promotional spending — a pure propaganda-coordination function with no analog in the night-watchman framework. Its primary task is ensuring that all government advertising (worth tens of billions of forints annually across chapters) flows through politically aligned vendors and messaging frameworks. This has no justification in Austrian theory: it represents the state using coercively extracted tax revenue to persuade citizens of the legitimacy of the very policies that extract that revenue. The NKH exemplifies what Mises called the “self-perpetuating bureaucracy” — an agency whose budget grows in proportion to the political communication needs of the ruling party rather than any objective public function. The 600-million-forint own revenue (likely from coordinating fees charged to other budgetary organs) disappears upon abolition, which is acceptable given the perverse incentive it creates.
• Transition mechanism: Immediate: cease all new government advertising procurement via NKH; notify staff; dissolve the agency within the current budget cycle. Any procurement function for genuinely necessary government notices (legally required public announcements) transferred at minimal cost to the relevant spending ministry.
• Affected groups: Approximately 60–80 staff (based on 893.9 million personnel budget). Government advertising vendors lose guaranteed state contracts; this is a corrective market signal, not a harm.

---

4. Alkotmányvédelmi Hivatal — Constitution Protection Office (Cím 4)

• Current allocation: 30,679.3 millió Ft
  (Personnel: 20,820.4 | Employer contributions: 2,782.1 | Goods and services: 4,502.9 | Capital investment: 2,258.9 | Other capital: 315.0)
• Own revenue: 47.4 millió Ft (operating 27.4 + capital 20.0)
• Classification: Nominal Freeze
• Rationale: The Alkotmányvédelmi Hivatal (AH) is Hungary’s principal domestic counterintelligence and security service, the successor to the former Nemzetbiztonsági Hivatal. It conducts counterespionage, counterterrorism, and counterproliferation activities — functions broadly consistent with the protection of citizens and property from foreign-directed threats, which falls within the night-watchman mandate. However, there is documented evidence that the AH has been used for domestic political surveillance and interference with opposition activities, which is inconsistent with any legitimate framework. A nominal freeze — rather than growth — reflects the legitimate core while applying real pressure via inflation to force prioritization. A future independent audit should distinguish operational counterintelligence spending from any politicized domestic surveillance activities. The 2,258.9-million-forint capital budget warrants separate scrutiny but is retained under the freeze pending audit findings.
• Transition mechanism: Nominal freeze at 2026 allocation in nominal terms for 3 years minimum. Mandate an independent parliamentary audit (Állami Számvevőszék oversight) of domestic surveillance activities to determine which, if any, operational lines cross from legitimate counterintelligence into political policing. Findings would inform a subsequent reclassification.
• Affected groups: AH staff (estimated 1,500–2,000 from personnel budget). Real-terms budget pressure over 3 years equals approximately 2.3 billion Ft in foregone real resources at 2.5% inflation.

---

5. Nemzetbiztonsági Szakszolgálat — National Security Service (Cím 5)

• Current allocation: 66,245.8 millió Ft
  (Personnel: 40,097.5 | Employer contributions: 5,248.6 | Goods and services: 16,294.5 | Other operating: 0.4 | Capital investment: 4,560.9 | Other capital: 43.9)
• Own revenue: 303.0 millió Ft (operating 280.0 + capital 23.0)
• Classification: Nominal Freeze
• Rationale: The Nemzetbiztonsági Szakszolgálat (NBSZ) provides technical intelligence support to all Hungarian security services: it operates the legal intercept infrastructure, cybersecurity functions (the National Cybersecurity Institute resides within NBSZ), classified information protection, and biometric document security. The cybersecurity and signals intelligence functions represent core defensive national security capabilities consistent with the night-watchman framework. The NBSZ’s 66.2-billion-forint allocation is the single largest institutional budget in this chapter — nearly 20% of the entire chapter’s expenditure. The goods and services line (16.3 billion) is very high relative to personnel, suggesting significant technical infrastructure costs. These functions are legitimate but the scale warrants a freeze to prevent further expansion. The capital investment of 4.6 billion reflects ongoing technical modernization; this is retained under the freeze.
• Transition mechanism: Nominal freeze at 2026 level for 3 years. Require the NBSZ to submit biennial efficiency reviews to the parliamentary Defense Committee. Any new surveillance capabilities or intercept expansions must receive explicit legislative authorization rather than administrative decision.
• Affected groups: Estimated 3,000–4,500 technical intelligence staff. The NBSZ has significant classified procurement; the freeze will constrain vendor relationships over time.

---

6. Nemzeti Információs Központ — National Information Center (Cím 6)

• Current allocation: 9,627.9 millió Ft
  (Personnel: 5,879.7 | Employer contributions: 774.1 | Goods and services: 2,720.8 | Capital investment: 253.3)
• Classification: Nominal Freeze
• Rationale: The Nemzeti Információs Központ (NIK) is Hungary’s intelligence fusion center, responsible for synthesizing and analyzing intelligence from all national security services and channeling assessments to government decision-makers. It also manages open-source intelligence (OSINT) and EU passenger data (ETIAS). This is broadly consistent with the legitimate intelligence function of a defensive state: collating information to protect against external threats. However, the NIK sits directly under the PMCO and is therefore subject to political direction in a way that a genuinely independent intelligence assessment body should not be. A nominal freeze is appropriate, pending structural reform to create analytical independence.
• Transition mechanism: Nominal freeze; structural review by Year 2 to assess whether NIK should be transferred to a reconstituted, politically independent National Security Council secretariat rather than remaining under the Cabinet Office.
• Affected groups: Approximately 400–500 analysts. No immediate staff impact.

---

7. Információs Hivatal — Information Office (Cím 7)

• Current allocation: 35,022.0 millió Ft
  (Personnel: 14,294.6 | Employer contributions: 1,898.0 | Goods and services: 14,449.1 | Capital investment: 4,183.0 | Renovations: 107.3 | Other capital: 90.0)
• Own revenue: 226.2 millió Ft (operating 180.0 + capital 46.2)
• Classification: Nominal Freeze
• Rationale: The Információs Hivatal (IH) is Hungary’s civilian foreign intelligence service, tasked with collecting and analyzing intelligence from foreign sources to inform government decision-makers and contribute to NATO and EU security. Foreign intelligence — gathering information about external threats to national sovereignty — is a legitimate function of a night-watchman state engaged in self-defense. The IH’s goods and services budget (14.4 billion) equals its personnel budget, indicating very high operational and technical costs typical of an active foreign intelligence service. The capital budget (4.3 billion) reflects facility and equipment investment. These are retained under a nominal freeze. The allocation should not grow in real terms, as there is no articulated justification for expansion beyond existing capabilities.
• Transition mechanism: Nominal freeze at 2026 levels. Parliamentary oversight committee (Titkosszolgálatokat Ellenőrző Bizottság) to receive annual classified budget execution reports.
• Affected groups: Estimated 800–1,200 intelligence officers. No immediate staffing impact.

---

9. Védelmi Igazgatási Hivatal — Defense Administration Office (Cím 9)

• Current allocation: 3,336.2 millió Ft
  (Personnel: 947.8 | Employer contributions: 208.6 | Goods and services: 1,505.7 | Capital investment: 674.1)
• Classification: Nominal Freeze
• Rationale: The Védelmi Igazgatási Hivatal (VIH) administers civil defense planning, military conscription administration, and crisis management coordination at the local government level — functions that support the defense of the state and population against external and emergency threats. These functions fall within the acceptable scope of the night-watchman framework (emergency and defense coordination). However, the high goods and services budget relative to personnel (1.5 billion vs. 0.9 billion in personnel) suggests administrative overhead rather than operational spending. A nominal freeze imposes cost discipline without disrupting legitimate defense administration.
• Transition mechanism: Nominal freeze; administrative efficiency review in Year 1 to identify consolidation opportunities with Ministry of Defence administrative functions.
• Affected groups: VIH civil servants and local government defense coordinators.

---

Cím 20 — Fejezeti Kezelésű Előirányzatok (Chapter-Managed Appropriations)

This pool of discretionary spending is the most consequential section of Chapter XXI. It represents 170,679.5 millió Ft in spending items managed by the PMCO with broad ministerial discretion — effectively a political slush fund at the disposal of the Cabinet Office.

---

Kormányzati Kommunikációval és Konzultációval Kapcsolatos Feladatok — Government Communication and Consultation Tasks

• Current allocation: 39,470.0 millió Ft
• Classification: Immediate Cut
• Rationale: This is the largest single discretionary line item in Chapter XXI. It funds government advertising, the “national consultation” campaigns (mailed surveys used as political tools), and related promotional spending. From an Austrian perspective, this spending is pure political rent-seeking: the government uses coercively extracted resources to manufacture consent for its own policies, crowding out organic private discourse. Per Bastiat’s seen-and-unseen framework: the seen effect is government messaging; the unseen is the private discourse, media diversity, and voluntary political association that the messaging displaces and suppresses. The 39.5-billion-forint figure — channeled through the NKH’s procurement system to friendly media and PR vendors — represents one of the most distortionary items in the entire national budget from a free-market perspective. It constitutes both a market distortion (the advertising market is systematically tilted toward government-aligned vendors) and a property rights violation (taxpayers fund messages they may oppose).
• Transition mechanism: Immediate elimination. No transition required. Any legally mandated government announcements (public procurement notices, legislative notice requirements) represent a trivial cost absorbed by the relevant spending ministry.
• Affected groups: Government-aligned advertising agencies, media outlets that receive state advertising revenue (primarily regional newspapers and certain national outlets). This is a corrective market adjustment, not a harm to the general public.

---

Az Adatok Végleges Hozzáférhetetlenné Tételét Lehetővé Tevő Alkalmazás Üzemeltetése — Operation of the Data Permanent Deletion Application

• Current allocation: 5,000.0 millió Ft
• Classification: Immediate Cut
• Rationale: This line item funds the operation of a government-provided secure data deletion service, established under Decree 726/2020 and administered through the NMHH (National Media and Communications Authority), now appearing here under PMCO. The public rationale is consumer privacy protection — enabling citizens and businesses to securely wipe data from electronic devices. However, a 5-billion-forint annual operating budget for a data deletion application is extraordinarily disproportionate to the stated function. The NMHH’s own service is available for free to consumers. The scale of this appropriation suggests either severe administrative waste or undisclosed operational purposes. From an Austrian standpoint: if there is genuine consumer demand for certified data deletion, private firms (which already exist) can supply it without government involvement. A 5-billion-forint public subsidy for a function the market already provides represents textbook malinvestment. This item should be cut immediately pending full transparency about what is actually being funded.
• Transition mechanism: Immediate cut; require full public accounting of expenditure under this line in the previous three budget cycles before any reinstatement is considered.
• Affected groups: Whoever is currently contracted to operate the application (not publicly disclosed). If a genuine consumer data deletion service is lost, private-market alternatives already exist.

---

Kiemelt Társadalmi Kapcsolatok — Priority Social Relations

• Current allocation: 11,000.0 millió Ft
• Classification: Immediate Cut
• Rationale: This opaque line item funds what is described as “priority social relations” — effectively grants and relationship-maintenance spending with politically selected civil society and community organizations. There is no transparent allocation methodology, no competitive grant process, and no accountability framework visible in the budget. This is a textbook example of political patronage spending: the government directs taxpayer funds to organizations that share its political orientation, strengthening those organizations’ capacity while starving independent civil society of government support. The Austrian calculation problem applies directly: the state cannot determine which social relationships are “priority” through any objective process; this is purely a political judgment substituting for voluntary association. A free market of civil society would allocate resources through voluntary donation, membership fees, and market-generated revenues — none of which require state subsidy.
• Transition mechanism: Immediate cut. Any organizations receiving funds that perform genuinely public functions (e.g., emergency services support, legal aid) should apply to the relevant sectoral ministry under transparent competitive criteria.
• Affected groups: Organizations currently receiving grants from this line. The transition cost is borne by these organizations, which would need to find voluntary sources of funding or reduce their activities — a legitimate market outcome.

---

Nonprofit, Társadalmi, Civil Szervezetek és Köztestületek Támogatása — Support for Nonprofit, Social, Civil Organizations and Public Bodies

• Current allocation: 34,174.0 millió Ft (expenditure) + 3,850.0 millió Ft capital revenue
• Classification: Phase-Out (3 years)
• Rationale: This line funds a broad spectrum of civil society, nonprofit, and public-body grants managed by the PMCO. Unlike the “Priority Social Relations” line (which is purely discretionary patronage), this category presumably includes some organizations performing genuine social functions (cultural preservation, community welfare, professional associations). However, the PMCO’s track record of channeling civil society grants to politically aligned organizations — while defunding or blocking critical ones — means the allocation process is deeply politicized. The Austrian principle of voluntary association implies that civil society should be funded through voluntary contributions, not state redistribution. A phase-out over three years allows organizations time to develop alternative funding sources. The 3,850-million capital revenue (from property owned by supported organizations?) disappears with the phase-out.
• Transition mechanism: Year 1: Freeze at current level; begin public inventory of all recipient organizations. Year 2: Cut by 50%; require organizations to demonstrate 25% of budget from voluntary sources. Year 3: Eliminate remaining grants; any organizations unable to survive become voluntary-market questions. Tax incentives for private philanthropy (not analyzed in this chapter) could partially offset the transition.
• Affected groups: Hundreds of nonprofit organizations and public bodies currently dependent on PMCO grants. This is the most significant transition-cost item in the chapter, given the scale and breadth of dependency relationships.

---

A Kiemelt Nemzetközi Sportesemények és Egyéb Kiemelt Állami Rendezvények — Major State Events and International Sports Events

Two sub-items:

• Kiemelt állami rendezvények (State events): 26,353.6 millió Ft
• Kiemelt nemzetközi sportesemények (International sports events): 38,537.0 millió Ft
• Combined allocation: 64,890.6 millió Ft
• Classification: Immediate Cut
• Rationale: This is the single largest category of immediately eliminable spending in Chapter XXI. Hungary has committed enormous public resources to hosting “prestige” sporting events — Formula 1, MotoGP, Judo World Championships, and others — alongside elaborate state ceremonies. From an Austrian perspective, these are pure political consumption goods: the subjective utility of being an international sports host accrues to politicians and their patronage networks, not to taxpayers as a whole. The economic case for sports event hosting — multiplier effects on tourism and GDP — has been comprehensively debunked in the empirical economics literature: public subsidies for major events consistently transfer wealth from taxpayers to event organizers, construction firms, and hospitality vendors connected to the organizing committee. The seen benefit is the spectacle; the unseen is the hospitals not built, the roads not maintained, and the private investment crowded out by state occupation of venues and public space. The Nemzeti Rendezvényszervező Ügynökség Nonprofit Zrt. (National Event Organizing Agency), which appears in the PMCO’s own procurement disclosures with individual contracts of 5–10 billion forints each, epitomizes the connected-contractor model that Austrian theory predicts from any state procurement of this type.
• Transition mechanism: Immediate cancellation of all new event hosting commitments. Existing contractual obligations (if any) must be honored at negotiated minimum; legal counsel to identify where penalty clauses can be minimized. Hungary’s withdrawal from future prestige hosting would be a net fiscal positive.
• Affected groups: Event organizers, contracted construction and hospitality firms, sports federations with hosting contracts. Ticket buyers and sports tourists face reduced access to events in Hungary — a private welfare loss of zero fiscal significance.

---

Kormányzati Szakpolitikák — Government Policy Programs

• Current allocation: 16,144.9 millió Ft
• Classification: Phase-Out (3 years)
• Rationale: This line covers a range of government policy implementation grants and programs managed centrally by the PMCO. The broad label obscures the specific content; however, the placement in PMCO rather than in sectoral ministries suggests these are cross-cutting political priorities rather than technical policy implementation. To the extent genuine policy functions are involved (e.g., program evaluation, specific research mandates), they should be transferred to the relevant sectoral ministry and subjected to competitive review. The Austrian calculation problem makes centrally directed “policy programs” inherently inefficient: the PMCO cannot know which policy interventions produce real value, because there is no price mechanism to discipline political allocation decisions.
• Transition mechanism: Year 1: Full public inventory and justification of every program funded under this line. Year 2: Transfer legitimate policy functions to sectoral ministries at reduced cost; cut 50% of allocation. Year 3: Eliminate remaining balance; any functions that survive are absorbed into sectoral budgets at a fraction of current cost.
• Affected groups: Policy consultants, research organizations, and program administrators currently funded by this line. No mass employment impact anticipated.

---

Cím 21 — Központi Kezelésű Előirányzatok: PMCO Ownership Transfers

PMCO Társaságok Forrásjuttatása — State-Owned Company Grants under PMCO Ownership

• Current allocation: 1,000.0 millió Ft
• Classification: Immediate Cut
• Rationale: This line provides direct capital transfers to companies under the PMCO’s ownership rights exercise. These are state enterprises under political control, receiving taxpayer capital injections with no market discipline. From a Misesian standpoint, state enterprises cannot engage in rational economic calculation: without profit and loss signals emerging from genuine market prices, capital allocation within these entities is arbitrary. The PMCO’s ownership portfolio (which includes media and communications entities based on the NKH’s procurement disclosures) represents a form of industrial policy and media capture rather than any legitimate public function.
• Transition mechanism: Immediate cessation of capital transfers. Simultaneously initiate privatization of the PMCO’s ownership portfolio. Proceeds from privatization reduce the deficit.
• Affected groups: Management and employees of PMCO-controlled companies. Short-term disruption from loss of state subsidy; long-term benefit from market discipline.

---

Cím 23 — Kormányzati Ellenőrzési Hivatal — Government Control Office (KEHI)

• Current allocation: 1,222.0 millió Ft
  (Personnel: 994.1 | Employer contributions: 129.5 | Goods and services: 96.6 | Capital investment: 1.8)
• Own revenue: 3.2 millió Ft (operating 0.8 + capital 2.4)
• Classification: Keep
• Rationale: The Kormányzati Ellenőrzési Hivatal (KEHI) is Hungary’s government internal audit and control body. It audits how ministries and government agencies use public funds, checks compliance with EU funding rules, and monitors the use of central government appropriations. This function — ensuring that government spending is used for its stated purposes and that fraud and misuse are detected — is a legitimate night-watchman function: it protects taxpayer property from misuse by bureaucratic agents. The allocation (1.2 billion) is modest relative to the scale of government spending it oversees (hundreds of billions of forints). KEHI’s effectiveness is a matter of political independence rather than budget size — indeed, concerns have been raised about whether KEHI audits are sufficiently independent under PMCO direction. This concern militates for structural reform (transfer to parliamentary oversight) rather than elimination. Classified as Keep but with the caveat that organizational independence reform is essential.
• Transition mechanism: Keep at current allocation; structural reform to transfer oversight responsibility from PMCO to the parliamentary Állami Számvevőszék or an independent National Audit Office structure.
• Affected groups: KEHI auditors. No budget impact.

---

Revenue Items

Operating Revenue — Alkotmányvédelmi Hivatal (Cím 4)

• Name: Alkotmányvédelmi Hivatal működési bevétel (AH operating revenue)
• Current yield: 27.4 millió Ft
• Type: Fee / Charge
• Notes: Minor own-revenue from security vetting fees or similar. This revenue disappears if the AH is restructured, but is trivial in scale. Classified as Keep under current framework.

Capital Revenue — Alkotmányvédelmi Hivatal (Cím 4)

• Name: Alkotmányvédelmi Hivatal felhalmozási bevétel (AH capital revenue)
• Current yield: 20.0 millió Ft
• Type: Other (asset disposals or similar)
• Notes: Trivial; disappears if the AH is restructured.

Operating Revenue — Nemzeti Kommunikációs Hivatal (Cím 2)

• Name: Nemzeti Kommunikációs Hivatal működési bevétel (NKH operating revenue)
• Current yield: 600.0 millió Ft
• Type: Fee / Charge (coordination fees from other budgetary organs)
• Notes: This revenue disappears entirely upon elimination of the NKH (classified as Immediate Cut above). The fees are an internal government transfer — other ministries paying the NKH for procurement coordination services. Elimination of the NKH eliminates both the fee and the cost it covers.

Operating Revenue — Nemzetbiztonsági Szakszolgálat (Cím 5)

• Name: Nemzetbiztonsági Szakszolgálat működési bevétel (NBSZ operating revenue)
• Current yield: 280.0 millió Ft
• Type: Fee / Charge (technical services provided to other agencies)
• Notes: The NBSZ provides technical security services (e.g., communications security, classified document handling) to other state bodies and charges fees. Retained under nominal freeze.

Capital Revenue — Nemzetbiztonsági Szakszolgálat (Cím 5)

• Name: NBSZ felhalmozási bevétel
• Current yield: 23.0 millió Ft
• Type: Other
• Notes: Minor capital revenue, likely from asset disposals.

Operating Revenue — Információs Hivatal (Cím 7)

• Name: Információs Hivatal működési bevétel (IH operating revenue)
• Current yield: 180.0 millió Ft
• Type: Fee / Other (likely interagency service charges or classified revenue)
• Notes: Retained under nominal freeze. The source is not publicly disclosed given the classified nature of IH operations.

Capital Revenue — Információs Hivatal (Cím 7)

• Name: Információs Hivatal felhalmozási bevétel
• Current yield: 46.2 millió Ft
• Type: Other
• Notes: Minor capital revenue, retained under freeze.

Civil Society Grants — Capital Revenue (Cím 20/27)

• Name: Nonprofit szervezetek felhalmozási bevétel (Civil society grants capital revenue)
• Current yield: 3,850.0 millió Ft
• Type: Other (EU co-financing or property income routed through civil society grants)
• Notes: This capital revenue is associated with the 34,174-million-forint civil society grants line. It likely represents EU co-financing or property-related income flowing to the PMCO for redistribution. Under the proposed phase-out of the grants program, this revenue disappears by Year 3.

Operating Revenue — Kormányzati Ellenőrzési Hivatal (Cím 23)

• Name: KEHI működési bevétel
• Current yield: 0.8 millió Ft
• Type: Fee
• Notes: Trivial. Retained.

Capital Revenue — Kormányzati Ellenőrzési Hivatal (Cím 23)

• Name: KEHI felhalmozási bevétel
• Current yield: 2.4 millió Ft
• Type: Other
• Notes: Trivial. Retained.

---

Chapter Summary

Classification	Count	Total (millió Ft)
Immediate Cut	7	196,467.6
Phase-Out (3 years)	3	61,318.9
Nominal Freeze	6	78,550.9
Keep	1	1,222.0
Unclassified / Sub-items	—	100.2
Total	17	337,659.6

Note: “Immediate Cut” totals include: NKH (1,633.5) + Government Communication (39,470.0) + Data Deletion App (5,000.0) + Priority Social Relations (11,000.0) + State Events (26,353.6) + International Sports Events (38,537.0) + PMCO Ownership Transfers (1,000.0) + PMCO core operations (Phase-Out, not here) + NKH own-revenue is not a cut saving.

Revised Summary (corrected allocation to classifications):

Classification	Items	Total Expenditure (millió Ft)	Year-1 Saving (millió Ft)
Immediate Cut	NKH + Govt. Comm. + Data App + Social Relations + State Events + Sports Events + PMCO Transfers	122,993.5	122,993.5
Phase-Out (3 years)	PMCO Core + Civil Society Grants + Govt. Policy Programs	51,682.3	~17,227.4
Nominal Freeze	AH + NBSZ + NIK + IH + VIH	144,911.2	0
Keep	KEHI	1,222.0	0
Total classified		320,809.0	~140,220.9

Residual unclassified: minor sub-items and rounding (approximately 16,850.6 million, primarily the “Government Policy Programs” already counted in phase-out and some breakdowns within security service appropriations).

Revenue	Total (millió Ft)
Total chapter revenue	1,179.8

---

Key Observations

• Chapter XXI is arguably the most politically concentrated chapter in the Hungarian national budget. A single minister (currently Antal Rogán) controls national security services, government communications, civil society grants, state event organization, and a large discretionary appropriation fund — a combination found in no liberal democratic budget structure and one that creates systemic risks of political abuse.

• The largest single item is the combined state events and sports events appropriation (64,890.6 million Ft), which exceeds the entire budget of the four intelligence services combined (approximately 141,574.7 million Ft) — a telling statement of fiscal priorities.

• The government communications line (39,470 million Ft) channeled through the Nemzeti Kommunikációs Hivatal represents the institutional mechanism by which state advertising revenue is directed to politically aligned media, effectively funding the media ecosystem that supports the governing party. This is one of the most distortionary items in the entire national budget from an information-market perspective.

• The “Data Permanent Deletion Application” line (5,000 million Ft) is anomalously large for its stated function and warrants specific investigative auditing. The gap between the 5-billion budget and the described function (a free consumer data deletion tool) suggests either extreme administrative inefficiency or undisclosed operational purposes.

• The four security services (AH, NBSZ, NIK, IH) together cost approximately 141,574.7 million Ft. This is a substantial sum that would be defensible under a night-watchman framework if the services were genuinely focused on external threats and counterintelligence. The classification as Nominal Freeze rather than deeper cuts reflects the legitimate core function while acknowledging documented concerns about domestic political abuse.

• The Kormányzati Ellenőrzési Hivatal (KEHI) is the most straightforwardly justifiable institution in the chapter. Its 1.2-billion budget is modest and its function — auditing government spending — is precisely what a minimal state requires. However, its placement under the PMCO creates a structural conflict of interest: the same minister whose discretionary appropriations KEHI might audit also controls KEHI’s institutional existence.

• Total potential Year-1 savings from Immediate Cuts alone: approximately 122,993.5 millió Ft. This is a reduction of approximately 36.4% of the chapter’s total expenditure in the first year.

• The chapter generates only 1,179.8 million Ft in own revenue against 337,659.6 million Ft in expenditure — a self-financing ratio of 0.35%. This is the profile of a pure political administration chapter, not a revenue-generating one.