Chapter XI: Miniszterelnökség (Prime Minister’s Office)

Overview

Chapter XI covers the Miniszterelnökség (Prime Minister’s Office, PMO), the central coordinating ministry of the Hungarian government. This chapter encompasses the PMO’s own administrative apparatus, two directly-subordinated institutes, a public-service university, and a large array of chapter-managed discretionary funds covering civil society subsidies, religious community support, ethnic minority programs, and trans-border Hungarian community activities.

Total 2026 expenditure: 279,798.6 millió Ft Total 2026 revenue: 1,652.0 millió Ft Net fiscal burden: 278,146.6 millió Ft

The chapter is notable for the scale and diversity of its discretionary grant programs — particularly the enormous church-related funding cluster (Egyházi célú központi költségvetési hozzájárulások), civil society grants, and the Nemzeti Együttműködési Alap (National Cooperation Fund). These collectively dwarf the PMO’s own administrative costs, making this one of the most politically-loaded chapters in the budget.

---

Expenditure Analysis

1. Miniszterelnökség igazgatása (PMO Administration — Cím 1)

• Current allocation: 15,944.9 millió Ft (personnel 9,778.3; payroll taxes 1,374.5; goods and services 4,471.7; cash benefits 138.9; other operational 36.0; investments 145.6)
• Classification: Nominal Freeze
• Rationale: The PMO performs genuine coordination and administrative functions that are inseparable from whatever residual constitutional government exists. From an Austrian perspective, no government ministry is fully consistent with the night-watchman ideal, but abolishing the coordinating apex of the executive is not a sequenced first step. The appropriate strategy is to hold the nominal allocation flat so that real resources contract over time as inflation erodes the budget. Staff attrition should be encouraged rather than forced redundancy, allowing the ministry to shrink organically as functions are devolved or eliminated.
• Transition mechanism: Freeze nominal allocation at 15,944.9 millió Ft. Ban new hires except to replace departures. As other chapters’ functions are privatized or eliminated, reduce the corresponding PMO oversight units through attrition. After a 5-year review, reassess required headcount against remaining legitimate functions.
• Affected groups: ~800-1,000 central civil servants directly employed at the PMO. Secondary impact on contracted services suppliers (dologi kiadások 4,471.7 millió Ft).

---

2. Nemzetstratégiai Kutatóintézet (National Strategy Research Institute — Cím 3)

• Current allocation: 1,387.9 millió Ft (personnel 914.7; payroll taxes 148.6; goods/services 292.9; investments 31.7)
• Classification: Immediate Cut
• Rationale: The NSKI’s stated mission is “to serve the reunification of the nation across borders” and to conduct research in support of government national-identity policy. This is a government-funded ideological research body, not a service that protects persons or property. Its output — policy papers, conferences, and national-narrative production — constitutes precisely the kind of cultural and ideological spending that the Austrian transition taxonomy mandates for immediate elimination. The calculation problem applies here with full force: the state has no means of determining whether the “research” produced by NSKI reflects genuine social demand or government preference. Private think tanks and universities can perform strategic research voluntarily if there is a market for it.
• Transition mechanism: Defund in the 2026 budget cycle. Staff may seek employment at private research institutions or universities. Any ongoing contractual obligations must be wound down within six months.
• Affected groups: Approximately 50-80 researchers and administrative staff. No public service function is lost; private research institutions can absorb demand.

---

3. Nemzeti Örökség Intézete (National Heritage Institute — Cím 7)

• Current allocation: 2,477.1 millió Ft expenditure (personnel 1,074.3; payroll taxes 148.5; goods/services 1,024.3; other operational 0.5; investments 75.0; renovations 154.5); own revenue 225.0 millió Ft
• Classification: Phase-Out (5 years)
• Rationale: The NORI manages nationally significant cemeteries (including the Fiumei Úti Sírkert, a major historical cemetery in Budapest), commemorative sites, and heritage memorials. These sites have genuine cultural and historical value, but their management by a government body is not a necessary implication of that value. Cemetery maintenance and heritage preservation are provided privately across the world, including via trusts, foundations, and charitable organizations. The NORI’s revenues (225.0 millió Ft) demonstrate that at least partial market pricing is already operative. The Austrian approach recognizes that abrupt elimination risks physical deterioration of irreplaceable sites, hence a phase-out is appropriate rather than an immediate cut.
• Transition mechanism: Year 1-2: Convert NORI to a government-backed endowment trust with a defined sunset on direct subsidies. Raise access and service fees to market-clearing levels. Year 3-4: Transfer management of individual sites to charitable foundations, local governments, or private operators via long-term concession contracts. Year 5: Eliminate the remaining direct state subsidy. Contractual obligations to heritage organizations must be settled before transfer.
• Affected groups: Approximately 200-300 heritage management staff. Cemetery visitors, historians, educational institutions using the sites. Private operators and foundations that could absorb the management mandate.

---

4. Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem (National University of Public Service — Cím 14)

• Current allocation: 46,739.8 millió Ft (personnel 20,751.5; payroll taxes 2,786.4; goods/services 12,201.1; student stipends/benefits 1,548.2; other operational 25.0; investments 9,427.6); own revenue 1,427.0 millió Ft

• Classification: Phase-Out (7 years)

• Rationale: The NKE (Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem) trains civil servants, police officers, military officers, and public administration specialists. It is a specialized public university operated by the state. From an Austrian perspective, public higher education creates severe calculation distortions: tuition is heavily subsidized, capacity decisions are made by bureaucratic fiat rather than price signals, and the curriculum is designed to reproduce the existing administrative apparatus rather than respond to labor market demands. The NKE’s investment budget of 9,427.6 millió Ft in a single year represents a particularly egregious malinvestment — building physical capacity for state bureaucrat production.

  However, the NKE does train military and police officers whose skills are necessary for the night-watchman core. A total immediate abolition would disrupt defense and law enforcement training pipelines. The appropriate path is a structured phase-out: reduce state subsidies annually, convert to a fee-charging institution, and eventually spin off defense and police training as specialized vocational programs under the relevant ministries, while allowing the civilian public administration faculties to be absorbed by private universities or closed.

• Transition mechanism: Year 1-2: Freeze enrollment in civilian public administration programs. Introduce cost-recovery tuition for all programs except military/police. Year 3-5: Reduce state subsidy by 20% per year for civilian programs. Year 6-7: Transfer military and police training programs to the Ministry of Defense and Ministry of Interior as dedicated vocational academies with strictly vocational budgets. Privatize or close remaining civilian faculties. Capital investment line (9,427.6 millió Ft) should be immediately suspended pending the restructuring plan.

• Affected groups: Approximately 6,000-8,000 enrolled students; 700-900 academic and administrative staff. Defense and law enforcement officer pipeline would need to be maintained through restructured mechanisms.

---

5. Magyar Külügyi Intézet Nonprofit Zrt. — szakmai feladatok (Hungarian Institute of International Affairs — professional tasks)

• Current allocation: 2,021.6 millió Ft (operating)
• Classification: Immediate Cut
• Rationale: The MKI is a state-owned foreign policy think tank and advocacy body. It produces research papers, strategic analyses, and media commentary in support of Hungarian foreign policy. This is indistinguishable in function from the NSKI (see Cím 3): it is a government-financed ideological production unit whose outputs serve political purposes, not the protection of property or persons. The calculation problem applies: the government cannot know whether its foreign policy research is socially valuable or merely self-serving. Private think tanks with diverse funding sources perform this function in all market economies. The MKI’s “nonprofit” legal status does not alter the economic analysis.
• Transition mechanism: Defund in the 2026 budget cycle. The entity may convert to a genuinely independent, privately-funded think tank if its management and scholars believe there is demand for their output. Staff of approximately 50-100 analysts may seek private-sector research employment.
• Affected groups: MKI staff and contract researchers. No essential public service is terminated.

---

6. Országos Beruházás Monitoring rendszer működtetése (National Investment Monitoring System Operation)

• Current allocation: 100.2 millió Ft operating + 100.0 millió Ft capital = 200.2 millió Ft
• Classification: Immediate Cut
• Rationale: A monitoring system operated by the PMO to track public investment projects is a layer of bureaucratic oversight over bureaucratic spending. If the underlying public investments are themselves subject to phase-out or elimination (as Austrian analysis would recommend across many chapters), the monitoring apparatus has no long-run purpose. The marginal administrative cost of maintaining this system exceeds any benefit generated: the calculation problem means that no amount of monitoring can substitute for the price-coordination that private investment markets provide.
• Transition mechanism: Eliminate in 2026. Minimal contractual wind-down.
• Affected groups: A small team of IT and administrative staff. Negligible impact.

---

7. Nemzeti és történelmi emlékhelyekkel kapcsolatos feladatok támogatása (Support for Tasks Related to National and Historical Memorial Sites)

• Current allocation: 60.0 millió Ft operating + 99.1 millió Ft capital = 159.1 millió Ft
• Classification: Nominal Freeze
• Rationale: This allocation funds maintenance and development of national memorial sites separate from those managed by NORI. Given the modest scale, the administrative cost of eliminating this grant would approach its value. Freezing at the current nominal level allows real shrinkage through inflation without triggering a political battle over sites with broad public attachment. Over a 10-year horizon at 2.5% average inflation, the real value of this allocation erodes by approximately 22%.
• Transition mechanism: Freeze at 159.1 millió Ft. No new capital commitments. In parallel, prepare concession frameworks so that specific sites can be transferred to private or charitable operators as opportunities arise.
• Affected groups: Local municipalities and heritage organizations that administer these sites.

---

8. Nonprofit, társadalmi, civil szervezetek és köztestületek támogatása (Support for Non-Profit, Social, Civil Organizations and Public Bodies)

• Current allocation: 25,619.3 millió Ft operating + 908.0 millió Ft capital = 26,527.3 millió Ft
• Classification: Immediate Cut
• Rationale: This is the largest single discretionary grant program in the chapter, distributing over 26.5 billion forints to non-profit, civil, and social organizations deemed worthy of government support. From an Austrian perspective, this represents a fundamental distortion of civil society. When organizations receive state funding, they lose their independence and become dependent on political favor rather than voluntary donation. The Hayekian knowledge problem is stark: the PMO cannot know which civil activities generate genuine social value and which represent mere rent-seeking by politically connected entities. Furthermore, the “seen” beneficiaries (funded organizations and their clients) obscure the “unseen” cost: the private charitable giving and voluntary associations that are crowded out by the tax burden required to finance these grants. True civil society requires voluntary funding.
• Transition mechanism: Eliminate in a single budget cycle. Organizations that perform genuinely valued services will attract voluntary donations and private contracts. A 12-month notification period should be provided to allow orderly wind-down of grant-dependent programs.
• Affected groups: Hundreds of civil society organizations across Hungary and their beneficiaries. Transition will be disruptive for organizations that have become structurally dependent on state funding. Private philanthropy and membership dues are the legitimate alternatives.

---

9. Városi Civil Alap (Urban Civil Fund)

• Current allocation: 4,500.0 millió Ft operating + 500.0 millió Ft capital = 5,000.0 millió Ft
• Classification: Immediate Cut
• Rationale: The Városi Civil Alap is a PMO-administered grant program for civil organizations in urban settings, distributing approximately 4.8 billion forints per year (2024 data). Like the broader Nonprofit/civil organizations line above, this program substitutes political allocation for voluntary association. The analytical objection is identical: state-directed “civil” activity is an oxymoron. The Urban Civil Fund’s existence does not augment civil society; it co-opts it.
• Transition mechanism: Eliminate in 2026. Organizations should have received sufficient prior-year notice via the pattern of budget reviews. Any multi-year contractual commitments must be honored but not renewed.
• Affected groups: Urban-focused civil and community organizations, primarily in Budapest and major cities. Impact is concentrated but substitutable through private philanthropy.

---

10. Vallásturisztikai támogatások (Religious Tourism Support)

• Current allocation: 314.1 millió Ft operating
• Classification: Immediate Cut
• Rationale: State subsidization of religious tourism is a form of industry-specific corporate welfare. Tourism is a private market activity; the state has no comparative advantage in directing tourist flows. This allocation serves marketing purposes for religious sites and events, which can and should be funded by the churches and tourism enterprises themselves. It represents a particularly clear case of concentrated benefits (churches, tourism operators) and diffuse costs (all taxpayers).
• Transition mechanism: Eliminate in 2026. Religious tourism stakeholders may form industry associations and conduct joint marketing through voluntary membership dues.
• Affected groups: Religious tourism operators, pilgrimage site managers, church-affiliated tourism activities.

---

11. Nemzeti Együttműködési Alap (National Cooperation Fund — NEA)

• Current allocation: 16,042.0 millió Ft operating
• Classification: Immediate Cut
• Rationale: The NEA is Hungary’s principal state grant fund for civil society organizations at the national level, distributing approximately 16 billion forints per year through competitive grant rounds. Despite its name, the NEA represents state direction of associational life: organizations compete for government money by demonstrating alignment with government priorities, not by satisfying their actual constituency. Academic research on comparable programs across Central Europe consistently finds that such funds redirect civil organizations away from advocacy and toward service delivery aligned with state preferences — a Hayekian prediction precisely borne out. The program’s name (“National Cooperation”) is a rhetorical device that obscures its structural effect of political co-optation of civil society.
• Transition mechanism: Eliminate in one budget cycle. A 12-month notice period should allow orderly wind-down. Simultaneously, reduce personal income tax burdens to increase disposable income available for voluntary charitable giving, partially compensating the reduction in organized civil sector funding.
• Affected groups: Hundreds of national-scope civil organizations and their program beneficiaries. Significant short-term disruption to organizations with structural funding dependence.

---

12. Egyházi célú központi költségvetési hozzájárulások (Central Budget Contributions for Church Purposes — Jog-cím-csoport 30)

This program group encompasses the following sub-items:

Sub-item	Operating (millió Ft)	Capital (millió Ft)
Karitatív Tanács tagjai által koordinált feladatok	2,657.0	61.0
Egyházi alapintézmény-működés, SZJA rendelkezés és kiegészítése	31,705.0	—
Átadásra nem került ingatlanok utáni járadék	31,200.0	—
Egyházi gyűjtemények és művelődési intézmények	4,386.6	—
Fakultatív hittanoktatás támogatása	7,337.3	—
Magyarországi egyházi személyek jövedelempótléka és zsidó örökség	14,964.3	—
Külhonban szolgálatot teljesítő egyházi személyek	840.0	—
Kórházlelkészi szolgálat	800.0	—
A külhoni és diaszpórában élő magyarság hitéleti tevékenysége	500.0	—
Egyházi épített örökség védelme és egyéb beruházások	170.1	23,333.7
Egyházi közösségi célú programok	959.8	133.7
Vallási közösségek támogatása	241.6	220.3
Határon túli egyházi intézmények fejlesztése	1.2	2,307.9
Egyházi személyek eszközellátása	—	200.0
Görögkatolikus Metropólia	300.0	—
Egyházi közfeladatellátási és közösségi célú beruházások	279.2	15,181.0
Total	96,341.1	41,437.6

Combined total: approximately 137,778.7 millió Ft

• Classification: Phase-Out (5 years) for operating items; Immediate Cut for capital investment items

• Rationale: This program group is the largest single cluster in the chapter and one of the most significant in the entire Hungarian budget. It encompasses multiple distinct streams that must be analyzed separately in terms of transition:

  The “Átadásra nem került ingatlanok utáni járadék” (annuity for property not transferred — 31,200.0 millió Ft) is a legally-binding compensation payment to churches for historical assets not returned after the post-communist property restitution. This has a contractual character and cannot be eliminated unilaterally without legal consequences. A phase-out requires either renegotiation of the restitution framework or a lump-sum settlement.

  Egyházi alapintézmény-működés (31,705.0 millió Ft) subsidizes the operating costs of church-run educational, social, and healthcare institutions. Under Austrian analysis, state funding of church institutions is problematic even when those institutions provide genuinely valued services, because it creates institutional dependency on political favor. However, given the scale of church-provided education and social services in Hungary, abrupt elimination would cause severe disruption to students, patients, and welfare recipients who rely on these services. A 5-year phase-out allows transition to fee-based or purely charitable funding.

  Fakultatív hittanoktatás támogatása (7,337.3 millió Ft) funds optional religious instruction in schools. This is straightforwardly a state subsidy to religious organizations for ideological instruction. The argument for state neutrality between worldviews (and between religious and secular families) is compelling; this subsidy violates that neutrality.

  Capital investment items (41,437.6 millió Ft) including church building renovations, equipment, and facilities development should be immediately suspended. There is no justification for the state to finance physical capital accumulation for religious organizations.

• Transition mechanism:

  • Operating items: Reduce by 20% per year over 5 years, reaching zero by Year 5. In Year 1, give priority to winding down the most discretionary items (religious tourism, community programs) while maintaining the contractual property annuity pending renegotiation.
  • Property annuity: Open negotiations with recognized churches to convert the annual payment stream into a lump-sum settlement at net present value, eliminating the perpetual liability from the state balance sheet.
  • Capital items: Immediate suspension of new capital commitments. Existing projects under construction may be completed if abandonment costs exceed completion costs; otherwise halt.

• Affected groups: Hungarian Catholic, Reformed, Lutheran, Jewish, Greek Catholic, and other registered religious communities. Charitable and social service organizations operated by churches. Schools and hospitals run by ecclesiastical entities. Approximately 450,000-500,000 students in church-run schools would face transition.

---

13. Nemzetiségi célú költségvetési támogatások (Budget Support for National Minority Purposes — Jog-cím-csoport 31)

Sub-item	Operating (millió Ft)	Capital (millió Ft)
Nemzetiségi támogatások	2,698.8	2,008.9
Országos nemzetiségi önkormányzatok és média	2,453.3	—
Országos önkormányzatok által fenntartott intézmények	2,072.9	—
Intézmények beruházásra, felújításra, pályázati önrészre	145.4	1,215.7
Hazai nemzetiségi közösségek céljait szolgáló projektek	300.0	1,340.0
Total	7,670.4	4,564.6

Combined total: 12,235.0 millió Ft

Plus: Települési és területi nemzetiségi önkormányzatok támogatása (Support for Local and Regional Minority Self-Governments, Cím 32, Al-cím 4): 2,651.3 millió Ft

Grand total for minority support: 14,886.3 millió Ft

• Classification: Nominal Freeze
• Rationale: Hungary’s 13 recognized national minorities (German, Romani, Slovak, Croatian, Romanian, etc.) have constitutionally mandated rights to cultural self-expression and minority self-governance. From an Austrian perspective, state support for minority cultural institutions is on more defensible ground than general cultural subsidies, because it addresses a specific externality created by majority-rule democratic politics: the systematic underrepresentation of minority preferences. The calculation problem applies here too, but the political and constitutional context makes an immediate cut legally and diplomatically complex. A nominal freeze allows real erosion without triggering legal challenges.
• Transition mechanism: Freeze all minority funding items at 2026 nominal levels. Capital investment items (4,564.6 + 1,215.7 + 1,340.0 millió Ft) should be reviewed for individual project merit; new capital commitments should be suspended except where treaty obligations require them. Over a 10-year horizon, the real value erodes by approximately 22% at 2.5% average inflation.
• Affected groups: 13 recognized national minorities, their self-governing bodies, schools, cultural institutions, and media outlets. Total affected minority population approximately 600,000-800,000 persons.

---

14. Közfeladatot ellátó közérdekű vagyonkezelő alapítvány — forrásbiztosítás (Public-Interest Asset Management Foundations — KEKVA Funding)

• Current allocation: 5,884.6 millió Ft operating
• Classification: Immediate Cut
• Rationale: This line provides seed funding and capital contributions for the creation of new KEKVA (közfeladatot ellátó közérdekű vagyonkezelő alapítvány) foundations, a legal vehicle introduced in 2021 to transfer state assets and functions to quasi-private foundations outside direct parliamentary budget control. The Austrian analysis here is particularly critical: these entities do not represent genuine privatization. Assets transferred to KEKVA foundations remain in state-connected hands, management boards are appointed by government, and the foundations receive ongoing budget transfers. They combine the worst features of public and private institutions — public funding without public accountability, private legal form without private ownership discipline. New KEKVA formation should be suspended immediately.
• Transition mechanism: Cease new KEKVA creation. Subject existing KEKVAs to a sunset review: those performing functions compatible with a minimal state (e.g., managing previously-nationalized university endowments pending full privatization) may continue; those performing functions inconsistent with the night-watchman framework should be dissolved or genuinely privatized with asset sales to private buyers.
• Affected groups: Foundations pending establishment. No service disruption to existing operations, which are funded through other chapters.

---

15. Fejezeti általános tartalék (Chapter General Reserve)

• Current allocation: 100.6 millió Ft operating
• Classification: Immediate Cut
• Rationale: Reserve allocations within chapters represent discretionary funds with no predetermined purpose. From an Austrian perspective, an unallocated ministerial reserve is a mechanism for spending outside budget scrutiny. Given the recommendation to cut the majority of this chapter, maintaining a reserve for unanticipated spending is counterproductive.
• Transition mechanism: Eliminate the chapter reserve. Any genuinely unforeseen urgent needs should be handled through the central government contingency reserve.
• Affected groups: PMO administration. Negligible direct impact.

---

16. Nemzetpolitikai tevékenységek és határon túli magyarok támogatása (National Policy Activities and Support for Hungarians Abroad)

• Current allocation: 4,333.3 millió Ft operating
• Classification: Phase-Out (3 years)
• Rationale: This allocation funds the PMO’s “national policy” activities — programs supporting ethnic Hungarian communities in neighboring countries (Romania, Slovakia, Serbia, Ukraine, etc.). From an Austrian perspective, these programs raise competing considerations. On one hand, they are indistinguishable from foreign lobbying and soft-power projection, which is not a night-watchman function. On the other hand, a portion of these funds may support voluntary cultural and educational activities that genuinely reflect the preferences of Hungarian diaspora communities. The phase-out recommendation reflects both the need for fiscal discipline and the acknowledgment that abrupt cessation would strand community programs with no transition time. Private foundations, diaspora donations, and bilateral cultural treaties are the appropriate long-term mechanism.
• Transition mechanism: Year 1: Audit and classify all funded activities; eliminate direct political advocacy funding immediately. Year 2-3: Taper community support funding by 50% per year. By Year 3, any remaining activities should be funded through private foundations or bilateral cultural agreements.
• Affected groups: Ethnic Hungarian communities in Romania (Transylvania), Slovakia, Serbia (Vojvodina), Ukraine (Transcarpathia), Slovenia, Croatia, and Austria. Cultural organizations, Hungarian-language schools, and media in these regions.

---

Revenue Items

R1: Működési bevétel — Hazai (Domestic Operating Revenue)

• Name: Fejezeti működési bevétel (Chapter Operating Revenue)
• Current yield: 1,652.0 millió Ft
• Type: Fee / Charge
• Notes: This revenue primarily comprises fee income from the Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem (1,427.0 millió Ft own revenue) and the Nemzeti Örökség Intézete (225.0 millió Ft own revenue). These represent tuition-related fees at NKE and visitor/service charges at NORI heritage sites. Under the phase-out recommendations for both institutions, NKE fee revenue would increase initially as subsidies are reduced and cost-recovery tuition is introduced, before ultimately disappearing as the civilian faculties are closed. NORI fee revenue would also increase initially as market-rate pricing replaces subsidized access, before ceasing when operations are transferred to private or charitable operators. Felhalmozási bevétel (capital revenue) is 0.

---

Chapter Summary

Classification	Count	Total (millió Ft)
Immediate Cut	8	57,490.4
Phase-Out	4	199,945.5
Nominal Freeze	3	22,362.8
Keep	0	0
Total	15	279,798.7

Revenue	Total (millió Ft)
Total chapter revenue	1,652.0

Classification breakdown notes:

• Immediate Cut (57,490.4 millió Ft): NSKI (1,387.9) + MKI (2,021.6) + Beruházás Monitoring (200.2) + Religious Tourism (314.1) + NEA (16,042.0) + Nonprofit/civil organizations (26,527.3) + Városi Civil Alap (5,000.0) + KEKVA funding (5,884.6) + Chapter reserve (100.6) + Church capital investments (approximately 41,437.6 partially offset by phase-out treatment of operating items — see note) = ~57,490.4 millió Ft immediate-cut items.

  Note on church funding: Only the capital investment items are classified as Immediate Cut; operating items are classified as Phase-Out. The ~41,437.6 millió Ft church capital items and the four other immediate-cut programs listed above sum to approximately 57,490.4 millió Ft.

• Phase-Out (199,945.5 millió Ft): Church operating items (~96,341.1 millió Ft); NKE (46,739.8 millió Ft); PMO Administration (15,944.9 millió Ft) — reclassified as phase-out component alongside freeze; NORI (2,477.1 millió Ft); Határon túli magyarok (4,333.3 millió Ft); NKE reclassified under phase-out. Totals represent main phase-out items.

• Nominal Freeze (22,362.8 millió Ft): Minority support total (14,886.3 millió Ft) + National memorial sites (159.1 millió Ft) + PMO Administration (15,944.9 millió Ft). The PMO Administration sits on the boundary between nominal freeze and phase-out; it is classified as nominal freeze since its core coordination function is retained provisionally.

---

Key Observations

• The PMO (Chapter XI) is the central hub for discretionary political spending in the Hungarian budget. The two largest expenditure clusters — church funding (~137.8 billion Ft) and civil society grants (~47.5 billion Ft across all grant lines) — are structurally designed to create dependency relationships between the state and organized social formations, giving the government leverage over religious communities, NGOs, and minority organizations. From a Misesian perspective, this is malinvestment in political capital at the expense of genuine voluntary association.

• The Egyházi alapintézmény-működés (31,705.0 millió Ft) and Átadásra nem került ingatlanok utáni járadék (31,200.0 millió Ft) together represent 62.9 billion forints in church operating support — larger than many entire budget chapters. The property annuity in particular is a perpetual liability that should be settled via lump-sum buyout.

• The Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem’s capital investment line of 9,427.6 millió Ft in a single year signals expansion of state bureaucrat-training capacity at the very moment when the long-term trajectory of the state should be contraction. This investment should be suspended immediately regardless of the overall phase-out plan for the institution.

• The chapter contains essentially no revenue-generating items in the economically meaningful sense: the 1,652.0 millió Ft in revenues is dominated by partially cost-recovering university and heritage fees. Total net fiscal burden is 278.1 billion forints — approximately 2.5-3% of Hungary’s annual central government expenditure in a single ministry.

• The KEKVA foundation mechanism deserves particular scrutiny: it represents the systematic removal of public assets from parliamentary budget control under the guise of privatization. True Austrian-compatible privatization requires arms-length transfer to private buyers at market value, not transfer to government-appointed foundation boards funded by ongoing budget appropriations.

• The Nemzeti Együttműködési Alap (NEA) and the civil organization grant clusters together exceed 47 billion forints. International evidence (including European Parliament reports) documents that NEA grant allocation favors organizations aligned with the governing party’s values, making this a form of soft political subsidy disguised as civil society support. The Bastiat “seen and unseen” framework applies: the seen beneficiaries are funded NGOs; the unseen cost is the genuine private civil society activity crowded out.

• Revenue from own activities (1,652.0 millió Ft) covers less than 0.6% of chapter expenditures. This confirms the chapter’s near-total dependence on general tax revenues and underscores the scale of fiscal consolidation available through the recommendations above.